Re: Last Call: draft-atlas-icmp-unnumbered (Extending ICMP for Interface and Next-hop Identification) to Proposed Standard

jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa) Thu, 10 December 2009 20:07 UTC

Return-Path: <jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A37028C143 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:07:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.417
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.417 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.182, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t3ArDmRqr4lY for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:07:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mercury.lcs.mit.edu (mercury.lcs.mit.edu [18.26.0.122]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FF0528C141 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:07:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11178) id D82496BE557; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:06:57 -0500 (EST)
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Last Call: draft-atlas-icmp-unnumbered (Extending ICMP for Interface and Next-hop Identification) to Proposed Standard
Message-Id: <20091210200657.D82496BE557@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:06:57 -0500
From: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu
Cc: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 20:07:11 -0000

    > From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>

    > IETF 2 - IETF 76 though must a record of sorts. Were you perhaps
    > working on something in IETF 1 that we still haven't succeeded in
    > completing?

Not sure about #1, I'd have to check and see what we were talking about there,
but....

I just had a quick look in my IETF #2 minutes, which lists three things I
wanted to add (I think there were more, but I don't recall them now, though,
not without digging up my 'internet-draft' on this topic); one of which had
to do with one aspect of dealing properly with a multi-homed host.

The last general topic is, of course, _still_ a very open issue... :-)

	Noel