Re: Last Call: draft-atlas-icmp-unnumbered (Extending ICMP for Interface and Next-hop Identification) to Proposed Standard

jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa) Fri, 04 December 2009 15:37 UTC

Return-Path: <jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 822E73A684A for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Dec 2009 07:37:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.397
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.397 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.202, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K1eFuzfNjNsY for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Dec 2009 07:37:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mercury.lcs.mit.edu (mercury.lcs.mit.edu [18.26.0.122]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C6343A6825 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Dec 2009 07:37:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11178) id 22CD16BE583; Fri, 4 Dec 2009 10:36:51 -0500 (EST)
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Last Call: draft-atlas-icmp-unnumbered (Extending ICMP for Interface and Next-hop Identification) to Proposed Standard
Message-Id: <20091204153651.22CD16BE583@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 10:36:51 -0500
From: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu
Cc: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 15:37:01 -0000

    > The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to
    > consider the following document:
    > 'Extending ICMP for Interface and Next-hop Identification'

How droll. There was a presentation at the _2nd_ IETF (in Aberdeen, Maryland)
to add similar functionality (although in a less comprehensive form) to ICMP.
The development of 'traceroute' removed the immediate pressure, and so it
never happened. Oh well, better late than never... :-)

	Noel