IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: And so it begins? SPF failure on self

George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org> Fri, 28 October 2016 04:45 UTC

Return-Path: <ggm@algebras.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C3361295C9 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 21:45:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=algebras-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wbif8kBEthLH for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 21:45:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua0-x22d.google.com (mail-ua0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A85F1295AC for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 21:45:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id 51so28121492uai.1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 21:45:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=algebras-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=2cLaprZo2wh57323+L80mG3iqb3yNfmJLegLZ87lGWI=; b=QHGw4ivrNhVrgtYim8TZogkvAvv/Qv83SYx8keGfZiPeDhyC3GEukgwBhCOCHbY5F1 eAiqngsG90YnewOORD0L7kvn+7W4GNTgzeNUJrKHXvvUCQoV8Js8ryoM1hPmAKUUAkx/ oKH7praXHC6TPhfyRSUj5Rak9uzMJB2ConC2n5XyXxuTYYwCIpl2dJL+ipp0cpS9H34r SnW6n2xgJdOLR065Bfv6gq5PoJ0UgkN8DyYWSw1AIYcp5AhOFcl5IKoxjq7WOSQmZDlX LnTX/OevgZtNAWsdNoVtkQNAs1D1uRrANiB4qTbIY+0jEUULPg6uqgWHE/ubGSBxqj4n jOVg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=2cLaprZo2wh57323+L80mG3iqb3yNfmJLegLZ87lGWI=; b=KFR03lu9gAQ+FP/9ZAM42fh0P+3V+oHLWoFix1KfPRmqqX4GYj/3tR/QwnoJsKPk4R 91vy/TkJvpWDJbVmJpyJZVG0VNFVlaHXNIzJsTSCtLJ108LMsfMmnoi+6jaVGwwXUldW 0K/L7OQEZIEHm1LpQb5Gr0TBc99RqITbDlof4VjBd4zrVlj8wKE+c9seOU58ivMm5M/o SDM/O9VqNEqO7o/SgStZznJhX2PZPOh9l2K/qQvYhFWplo3iZJE98F4xHElZTjZpSd4x QsuuRlBigss1wsCQ33sVuQ5nc3HEjU+WfFiZy6VNMfHGxDFChMo4WStFO7Za6PK0m8Xj q4jg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvcSOq0zCmIrKxylyV4LiVkdikapGUdtdKinHQ0Kzl+KQfDLcJDv3ybQx+PTQDy9enTckmhDaCHPabXP0g==
X-Received: by 10.159.32.8 with SMTP id 8mr10597059uam.102.1477629936663; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 21:45:36 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.103.95.5 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 21:45:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [2001:dc0:a000:4:c0dd:ad1d:e36d:ac5b]
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.20.1610280032240.14506@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.20.1610280032240.14506@bofh.nohats.ca>
From: George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 14:45:36 +1000
Message-ID: <CAKr6gn25VGE0t=+vK3dc+-UT3YV9_fr8q0jQB2RnZFdQEKX2nQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: And so it begins? SPF failure on self
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/aN1O03ZWeljVqKQEJbs1uLj-D8U>
Cc: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 04:45:39 -0000

Maybe, since we all have admission-test tokens for our subscriptions,
we could be allowed to whitelist things we know we live behind? I
think any spammer motivated enough to subscribe to an IETF list *and*
drive the whitelist engine, deserves our attention..

On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> wrote:
>
> Using my redhat.com address, I replied to a draft alias email address
> that includes myself, and the ietf mail server rejected the message
> to me (or at least I hope the others still got it)
>
> Is this a new ietf.org mail "feature" or did something on my redhat.com
> end change?
>
> Is there a way to make the email processing server at ietf.org a little
> smarter to not check SPF for outgoing mails that were expanded by
> itself?
>
> Paul
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email