Re: Remote Participation Services

joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Tue, 12 February 2013 03:23 UTC

Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E52321F88CA for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 19:23:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.454
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.145, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KqAPOyIzZdUu for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 19:23:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EB3021F889C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 19:23:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from joels-MacBook-Air.local (c-24-5-127-59.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.5.127.59]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r1C3NGvT087014 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 12 Feb 2013 03:23:17 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
Message-ID: <5119B59F.6080103@bogus.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 19:23:11 -0800
From: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:19.0) Gecko/20130117 Thunderbird/19.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Remote Participation Services
References: <CC6E5D3D-A7B6-4C73-8FE8-2B2CD8015304@ietf.org> <51199813.8060208@network-heretics.com>
In-Reply-To: <51199813.8060208@network-heretics.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (nagasaki.bogus.com [147.28.0.81]); Tue, 12 Feb 2013 03:23:18 +0000 (UTC)
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 03:23:25 -0000

On 2/11/13 5:17 PM, Keith Moore wrote:
> On 02/05/2013 11:04 AM, IETF Chair wrote:
>> 3.4. Slide Sharing
>>
>>     Slides are often sent by email in advance of the meeting.
>>         WebEx allows the slides and desktop applications to be viewed 
>> by the
>>     remote participants.  These are controlled by the presenter.  The
>>     presenter can be shifted from participant to participant as needed.
>>
>
> Can we *please* discourage the habit of treating IETF WG meetings as 
> one series of PowerPoint presentations after another?   This makes the 
> meetings much less productive.
>
> The notion that there are supposed to be slides for each presentation, 
> is IMO, a huge error.
If you have prepared materials for your segment of the agenda they 
should be available beforehand, full stop.

If you don't, then I imagine they won't be. you're depriving some of 
participants who may not be familiar with your work the opportunity to 
review what you want to discuss. but that's between you and your working 
group chairs.
>
> Keith
>