Re: Last Call: <draft-harkins-ipsecme-spsk-auth-06.txt> (Secure PSK Authentication for IKE) to Experimental RFC

RJ Atkinson <rja.lists@gmail.com> Tue, 17 January 2012 22:33 UTC

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1)
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-harkins-ipsecme-spsk-auth-06.txt> (Secure PSK Authentication for IKE) to Experimental RFC
From: RJ Atkinson <rja.lists@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120117201414.11129.19922.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 17:33:34 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <53B30146-B51E-4D68-9F0F-B5A4B47F98D3@gmail.com>
References: <20120117201414.11129.19922.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Precedence: list

On 17  Jan 2012, at 15:14 , The IESG wrote:
> The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
> the following document:
> - 'Secure PSK Authentication for IKE'
>  <draft-harkins-ipsecme-spsk-auth-06.txt> as an Experimental RFC
> 
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
> ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2012-02-14. Exceptionally, comments may be
> sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

This also seems fine to me for Experimental RFC.  The
proposed IANA allocation also seems fine to me.

As with the other 2 I-Ds on this topic today, I can't comment
on the mathematics or cryptographic aspects.  Getting a solid
technical review of those aspects would seem sensible.  The
IRTF CFRG might be one possible source of such a review.

Yours,

Ran

Re: Last Call: <draft-harkins-ipsecme-spsk-auth-0… RJ Atkinson