IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call: <draft-arkko-trip-registry-update-00.txt> (Update to the TRIP IANA Registry Rules Regarding Postal Addresses) to Informational RFC

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Sat, 01 December 2018 11:57 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0494130DBE; Sat, 1 Dec 2018 03:57:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.89
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.89 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_FILL_THIS_FORM_SHORT=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mywqTxyPX2LN; Sat, 1 Dec 2018 03:56:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [193.234.218.130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A05812F1A5; Sat, 1 Dec 2018 03:56:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D495E66025B; Sat, 1 Dec 2018 13:56:55 +0200 (EET)
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZT2l5H7IhZ0B; Sat, 1 Dec 2018 13:56:54 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2001:14b8:1829::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 682BA660252; Sat, 1 Dec 2018 13:56:54 +0200 (EET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-arkko-trip-registry-update-00.txt> (Update to the TRIP IANA Registry Rules Regarding Postal Addresses) to Informational RFC
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <923122EF-2C22-4A70-B17B-2A9505D7E76F@vigilsec.com>
Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2018 13:56:53 +0200
Cc: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>, draft-arkko-trip-registry-update@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <FF76EB1D-BC41-41B2-B174-4292D7C118E0@piuha.net>
References: <154361542734.27535.10383183340180057481.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <39E5F15D-54C0-431B-A54C-36977FFF4296@vigilsec.com> <BF6A2EBB-4E8C-4350-B7EA-CA2AD329EB3B@nohats.ca> <923122EF-2C22-4A70-B17B-2A9505D7E76F@vigilsec.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/bLENG4VsIhSXjENiAn15PNZmdl4>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2018 11:57:01 -0000

Thank you both for your review.

>> Maybe we can also mo longer allow postal addresses and telephone numbers from all existing drafts? :)
> 
> That is a separate discussion, and in fact, many drafts do not include a postal address for the authors.

+1 to what Russ is saying. We can make more progress by dealing with specific things separately. 

(And in a lot of cases the separate things have different circumstances, so they may need different actions. And I’m struggling to resist the temptation to discuss the drafts & RFCs case in this thread :-) so finishing this email to this.)

Jari

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email