Re: Last Call: <draft-arkko-trip-registry-update-00.txt> (Update to the TRIP IANA Registry Rules Regarding Postal Addresses) to Informational RFC

[Abdussalam Baryun <[e-mail]>]

The draft should be standard track to update RFC3219 standard. IMHO, while
this draft is informational
 it cannot update a standard RFC.  I a not sure if this has been done in
the past, but if it was done I disagree with such RFCs.

I think that the IANA consideration section is part of the standard, and I
don't consider it just information that may not affect the standard. I
think updating it may affect any standard/technology.

Best Regards,
AB

On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 12:04 AM The IESG <[e-mail]> wrote:

>
> The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
> the
> following document: - 'Update to the TRIP IANA Registry Rules Regarding
> Postal Addresses'
>   <draft-arkko-trip-registry-update-00.txt> as Informational RFC
>
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
> comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
> [e-mail] mailing lists by 2018-12-28. Exceptionally, comments may be
> sent to [e-mail] instead. In either case, please retain the
> beginning of
> the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
>
> Abstract
>
>
>    This memo updates the IANA registry rules for the Telephony Routing
>    over IP (TRIP) protocol, by no longer requiring that postal addresses
>    be included in contact information.
>
>    This memo updates RFC 3219.
>
>
>
>
> The file can be obtained via
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-arkko-trip-registry-update/
>
> IESG discussion can be tracked via
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-arkko-trip-registry-update/ballot/
>
>
> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
>
>
>
>
>