IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Proposed IESG Statement on IPR Declarations

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Wed, 13 July 2016 13:44 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE9AA12D802 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 06:44:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RDNS_NONE=0.793] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8F0tLJha1x5M for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 06:44:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from simon.songbird.com (unknown [72.52.113.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6670112D807 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 06:44:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.102.92] ([78.40.158.52]) (authenticated bits=0) by simon.songbird.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id u6DDic1F016386 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 13 Jul 2016 06:44:40 -0700
Subject: Re: Proposed IESG Statement on IPR Declarations
References: <20160707202122.23634.18168.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAC4RtVAEQfWN-xgtrDS0kKg6EV22hdskJKL++vsp80vi0XOjUA@mail.gmail.com> <9B54CC46-5A15-4996-B771-EB0E8AC22AFE@piuha.net> <B76F082313F94DC342AF0F7F@JcK-HP8200>
To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <48f97eb8-863a-cf3f-3626-1dba1851a3c6@dcrocker.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 14:43:49 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <B76F082313F94DC342AF0F7F@JcK-HP8200>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/bYPbfruDfDJSev56LApZUMzKWHk>
Cc: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 13:44:12 -0000

On 7/13/2016 1:24 PM, John C Klensin wrote:
> it
> seems to me that more documents/statements increases that risk.
>
> It seems to me that, if anything additional is needed, we should
> be either fixing the Note Well or putting the additional
> explanation on the IPR page (as Brian suggests).


+1

d/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email