re: I-D submission tool draft
sob@harvard.edu (scott bradner) Mon, 13 September 2004 12:54 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA24928; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 08:54:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C6qQg-0007Gx-Cp; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 08:59:34 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C6q9J-0005aS-2X; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 08:41:37 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C6q75-0005JX-0s; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 08:39:19 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA23879; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 08:39:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from newdev.eecs.harvard.edu ([140.247.60.212] helo=newdev.harvard.edu) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C6qBl-0006zP-8j; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 08:44:10 -0400
Received: by newdev.harvard.edu (Postfix, from userid 501) id 314BD8C98B; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 08:38:45 -0400 (EDT)
To: ietf@ietf.org, wgchairs@ietf.org
Message-Id: <20040913123845.314BD8C98B@newdev.harvard.edu>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 08:38:45 -0400
From: sob@harvard.edu
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 9182cfff02fae4f1b6e9349e01d62f32
Subject: re: I-D submission tool draft
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: ea4ac80f790299f943f0a53be7e1a21a
this looks pretty good but a few comments this seems to have taken the approach of taking a fully formed ID text and trying to parse and check it, not an unreasonable approach but was the alternative of having the submitter fill in some or all of the meta data on a submission form (authors names & contacts, filename, boilerplate options etc) considered? I think that this process is missing a chance to deal with one of the confusions about the IETF's process - if the submission process included a click-through agreement covering the IPR (copyright & patent disclosure) requirements it would eliminate any possibility for the submitter to claim that they did not know or for the submitter to say that some other text in the document negates the boilerplate - this is a proposal that has come up a few times over the last few years, if we create a tool for people to use to submit IDs it would seem to be a good time to implement such a process I will say that I'm not fond of the idea of requiring that WG chairs pre-approve the submission of -00 WG IDs, as a WG chair I'd rather be able to enforce me getting a chance to review the document first - I'm fine with letting a WG chair be able to pre approve but I do not think it should be the only way that the process should be able to work Scott _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
- I-D submission tool draft Henrik Levkowetz
- re: I-D submission tool draft scott bradner
- Re: [Tools-discuss] I-D submission tool draft Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: I-D submission tool draft Henrik Levkowetz
- re: I-D submission tool draft Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: I-D submission tool draft Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: I-D submission tool draft Bill Manning
- Re: I-D submission tool draft scott bradner
- Re: I-D submission tool draft James Kempf
- Re: I-D submission tool draft Bill Manning
- Re: I-D submission tool draft scott bradner