Re: CAT WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-cat-spkmgss-03.txt
John Linn <linn@cam.ov.com> Tue, 23 May 1995 18:29 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07490; 23 May 95 14:29 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07486; 23 May 95 14:29 EDT
Received: from pad-thai.cam.ov.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa11921; 23 May 95 14:29 EDT
Received: from MIT.EDU by pad-thai.cam.ov.com (8.6.12/) with SMTP id <NAA17357@pad-thai.cam.ov.com>; Tue, 23 May 1995 13:43:06 -0400
Received: from pad-thai.cam.ov.com by MIT.EDU with SMTP id AA05487; Tue, 23 May 95 13:42:44 EDT
Received: from winkl.cam.ov.com by pad-thai.cam.ov.com (8.6.12/) with ESMTP id <NAA17352@pad-thai.cam.ov.com>; Tue, 23 May 1995 13:43:04 -0400
Received: from localhost by winkl.cam.ov.com (8.6.10/4.7) id NAA16863; Tue, 23 May 1995 13:43:02 -0400
Message-Id: <199505231743.NAA16863@winkl.cam.ov.com>
To: John Linn <linn@cam.ov.com>
Cc: cat-ietf@mit.edu, linn@cam.ov.com
Subject: Re: CAT WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-cat-spkmgss-03.txt
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 17 May 1995 11:13:22 EDT." <199505171513.LAA14801@winkl.cam.ov.com>
Date: Tue, 23 May 1995 13:43:01 -0400
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: John Linn <linn@cam.ov.com>
I have a specific comment to make on draft-ietf-cat-spkmgss-03.txt, which I believe warrants a specific correction. The -03 draft cites RFC-1508, but (unlike draft-ietf-cat-spkmgss-02.txt) defines InitialContextToken as a SEQUENCE, rather than (per RFC-1508, Appendix B) as [APPLICATION 0] IMPLICIT SEQUENCE. For purposes of token demultiplexing in a multi-mechanism environment, the syntax from 1508 should be used for token framing. --jl