IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt

Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino <itojun@itojun.org> Tue, 03 July 2007 16:58 UTC

Return-path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I5li4-0007BL-8U; Tue, 03 Jul 2007 12:58:40 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I5li3-00079Y-3y for ietf@ietf.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2007 12:58:39 -0400
Received: from coconut.itojun.org ([2001:240:501:0:204:23ff:fecb:8908]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I5lhJ-0007UC-30 for ietf@ietf.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2007 12:58:39 -0400
Received: from coconut.itojun.org (localhost.itojun.org [127.0.0.1]) by coconut.itojun.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4882F233C6; Wed, 4 Jul 2007 01:57:51 +0900 (JST)
To: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>
In-reply-to: moore's message of Tue, 03 Jul 2007 12:23:59 -0400. <468A781F.8030506@cs.utk.edu>
X-Template-Reply-To: itojun@itojun.org
X-Template-Return-Receipt-To: itojun@itojun.org
X-PGP-Fingerprint: F8 24 B4 2C 8C 98 57 FD 90 5F B4 60 79 54 16 E2
From: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino <itojun@itojun.org>
Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2007 01:57:51 +0900
Message-Id: <20070703165751.4882F233C6@coconut.itojun.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--)
X-Scan-Signature: 93238566e09e6e262849b4f805833007
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

	i will be a bit implite.

>> 	as I posted before, almost every one of people who attends IETF are
>> 	running IPv6-capable operating system.  if you are not, you are very
>> 	out of date like 5 years.
>>   
>well, even if your OS supports IPv6 doesn't mean that it works well with
>things like your host-based firewall.

	if that is true, the company selling that host-based firewall is
	slacking.

>> 	IPv6 is not enabled just because implementers have been polite enough
>> 	not to enable IPv6 transition technologies like Teredo or 6to4 on by
>> 	default.  maybe we should think it over?
>word I hear is that Vista's enabling of such technologies is causing
>problems for enterprise networks because their traffic filters and
>intrusion detectors aren't set up to handle them.

	firewalls and IDS companies are slacking.

itojun
PS: in openbsd community if you do not commit frequently enough you will be
scolded for being a slacker.

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email