IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt

"Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com> Tue, 03 July 2007 15:38 UTC

Return-path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I5kS3-0007p5-VP; Tue, 03 Jul 2007 11:38:03 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I5kS2-0007ot-Cp for ietf@ietf.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2007 11:38:02 -0400
Received: from robin.verisign.com ([65.205.251.75]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I5kRM-00072F-0l for ietf@ietf.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2007 11:38:02 -0400
Received: from MOU1WNEXCN02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (mailer2.verisign.com [65.205.251.35]) by robin.verisign.com (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l63FbJgA027953; Tue, 3 Jul 2007 08:37:19 -0700
Received: from MOU1WNEXMB04.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([10.25.13.157]) by MOU1WNEXCN02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 3 Jul 2007 08:37:19 -0700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2007 08:37:18 -0700
Message-ID: <198A730C2044DE4A96749D13E167AD37012F6932@MOU1WNEXMB04.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
In-Reply-To: <1085C1AF-82B0-4C0E-A53A-4E2B34FBBFDE@virtualized.org>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
Thread-Index: Ace9IO+6TYq09LWKTXORge1p9CrfTgAXsYJQ
From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
To: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>, Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Jul 2007 15:37:19.0335 (UTC) FILETIME=[0A89BF70:01C7BD88]
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: cf4fa59384e76e63313391b70cd0dd25
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

> From: David Conrad [mailto:drc@virtualized.org] 

> I am also a bit confused how a "dual stack" transition strategy to
> IPv6 is going to work when the IPv4 address free pool is 
> exhausted in a few years without some form of NAT/ALG, but 
> maybe that's just me.

Perhaps the idea here is that when the IPv4 pool is exhausted, people will be forced to use IPv6.

If so it comes from the same school of politics that led folk to say 'IF NXT means that DNSSEC can't be deployed in .com that's a good thing because it will force people to reduce the size of .com'. That is an actual quote from a real DNSEXT meeting.

Its not going to work that way. All we will end up with is hyper-NAT. 

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email