IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Wed, 01 May 2013 20:17 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7D7021F99D8 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 May 2013 13:17:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.582
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.582 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.017, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id avxR0gBOwsfM for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 May 2013 13:17:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7985421F99A9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 May 2013 13:17:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.66] (76-218-9-215.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [76.218.9.215]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r41KHRFS004033 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 1 May 2013 13:17:30 -0700
Message-ID: <51817843.2000702@dcrocker.net>
Date: Wed, 01 May 2013 13:17:07 -0700
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process
References: <A5D17763-847B-4A29-8343-844588440BF2@piuha.net> <5181581E.9010501@dcrocker.net> <5181758E.5070008@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5181758E.5070008@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.66]); Wed, 01 May 2013 13:17:30 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: dcrocker@bbiw.net, IETF list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 May 2013 20:17:37 -0000

On 5/1/2013 1:05 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> On 02/05/2013 05:59, Dave Crocker wrote:
>>
>> The blog nicely classes the problem as being too heavy-weight during
>> final stages.  The quick discussion thread seems focused on adding a
>> moment at which the draft specification is considered 'baked'.
>>
>> I think that's still too late.
>
> What, you agree with your younger self?
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-carpenter-icar-sirs-01

I really dislike being consistent, and always have.


> Apart from the non-diverse acronym, I still think that proposal
> was a good one.

Me too.  Could be interesting to, ummmm, review it for updating...

d/


-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email