Fwd: [Ianaplan] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-06.txt> (Draft Response to the Internet Coordination Group Request for Proposals on the IANA protocol parameters registries) to Informational RFC

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Tue, 16 December 2014 12:26 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD9E11A1AF1 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 04:26:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9co74OHsf6Vs for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 04:25:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [193.234.218.130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E1951ACD6D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 04:25:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C49332CCBF; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 14:25:45 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TnRY4PbXDx_s; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 14:25:44 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92D0F2CC61; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 14:25:44 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Subject: Fwd: [Ianaplan] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-06.txt> (Draft Response to the Internet Coordination Group Request for Proposals on the IANA protocol parameters registries) to Informational RFC
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 06:35:34 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <96A1BE95-2440-483D-90F4-09DECD6DFF5E@piuha.net>
References: <GLEAIDJPBJDOLEICCGMNMEAFCPAA.rhill@hill-a.ch>
To: IETF-Discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/ew3gAVuOsTg6pTFBmap4f1HudzQ
Cc: rhill@hill-a.ch
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 12:26:01 -0000

I am forwarding the messages from Richard to ietf@ietf.org because there has been some technical reason why his e-mails did not make it to the list (or at least the archive). There is a Nov 27 message from him in the archive but nothing after that. I think that I have gotten all the messages, however. Richard, let me know otherwise.

This is the first of the four message that I have, from Dec 7.

Begin forwarded message:

> From: "Richard Hill" <rhill@hill-a.ch>
> Subject: RE: [Ianaplan] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-06.txt> (Draft Response to the Internet Coordination Group Request for Proposals on the IANA protocol parameters registries) to Informational RFC
> Date: 7 Dec 2014 06:32:44 EST
> To: <ietf@ietf.org>
> Cc: iesg@ietf.org
> Reply-To: rhill@hill-a.ch
> 
> On 27 November, I requested that the co-chairs provide a justification for
> the conclusion that rough consensus has been achieved, see:
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/current/msg01402.html
> 
> The requested justification has not yet been provided.
> 
> Therefore I request that the IESG request that the co-chairs provide the
> requested justificiation and I request that the IESG take no action
> regarding this draft until the requested justification has been provided.
> 
> Thanks and best,
> Richard
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ianaplan [mailto:ianaplan-bounces@ietf.org]On Behalf Of The IESG
>> Sent: mercredi, 26. novembre 2014 18:37
>> To: IETF-Announce
>> Cc: ianaplan@ietf.org
>> Subject: [Ianaplan] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-06.txt>
>> (Draft Response to the Internet Coordination Group Request for Proposals
>> on the IANA protocol parameters registries) to Informational RFC
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> The IESG has received a request from the Planning for the IANA/NTIA
>> Transition WG (ianaplan) to consider the following document:
>> - 'Draft Response to the Internet Coordination Group Request for
>> Proposals on the IANA protocol parameters registries'
>> <draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-06.txt> as Informational RFC
>> 
>> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
>> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
>> ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2014-12-15. Exceptionally, comments may be
>> sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
>> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
>> 
>> Abstract
>> 
>> 
>> This document contains the IETF response to a request for proposals
>> from the IANA Stewardship Transition Coordination Group regarding the
>> protocol parameters registries.  It is meant to be included in an
>> aggregate proposal that also includes contributions covering domain
>> names and numbering resources that will be submitted from their
>> respective operational communities.  The IETF community is invited to
>> comment and propose changes to this document.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> The file can be obtained via
>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response/
>> 
>> IESG discussion can be tracked via
>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response/ballot/
>> 
>> 
>> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ianaplan mailing list
>> Ianaplan@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan
>> 
>