Re: Remote Hubs

"Christian O'Flaherty" <christian.oflaherty@gmail.com> Thu, 10 March 2016 19:28 UTC

Return-Path: <christian.oflaherty@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C775912DC11; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 11:28:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wFck0ZQ3wtgq; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 11:28:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22a.google.com (mail-wm0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D93C612DC06; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 11:28:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id p65so1322530wmp.1; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 11:28:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=vaqQwMqz4Hj96d+/Wo7DLKpp6RQZvQFdL7SCyo5VHIc=; b=GKVlp0dgT5k8JXs4Vue4xvRHhbaSkkCd5x2gae2qC8hss+81PYOkyjQlzvb8BNo1N3 tU5FhcSSr0eAWCZKpTvnEWkqZWXlMUQC8WvvJR2dQfy1SOPDyrPeAh5MD5Jf4KgKW+vU x4J2BXfJJh3mLGLR9mP6ciVxJSTaHFyI2l5+2F+XFJn08mebC5dAdXInpHdZUC/tTaZU UXVappRDDmIFwoMu6/nkcoIKSey2B/L3OW9ha849Ep7mUl0hjTwz+M3GjmaUwJ01gV+A pLQUTQ5hGY6393x953UStXUGZOGW2XcsmDI6oWd5GD1pDsK8j0CBEHI/N5qMwOut92zL r21w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=vaqQwMqz4Hj96d+/Wo7DLKpp6RQZvQFdL7SCyo5VHIc=; b=l8kRLFMKmlgELTe7vcFqie4W1YGbxQOVGn0ItpN2UXww18uvuaMqIqAhvbIPgrux8s 8+EssDIblgJUrvnVGwDMPVmbfWEXyKinZloKLm+hJRzIki3BfenKsTWub49kyJO/DuL7 kmTrQoixnqbjm8jSx9e6f1u4kC5N0R/SD4SsWxQRH3wyX7igynoEOW4Vu9KqbXe7et2R PLv/wGD8xzsLesxSbqa5yItobAKe91C4hZtD4f0ZxVIHGyqRKd/0wtdBYSOUj+VerclO +einGEx4kcxyuT2P2owEKoBAHR+p4mvjwJVv2JGQdkrVyIkR9aNuNMOUtbmFY7YXAmrW rZEQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJI/QxPr+BkQBMAL5Ro7DXLOpXJTOIcEtShc2TjzoJDYyu13ODLoHrjoC8Cl/jywjICE4GMHD6CMIMQDww==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.28.19.130 with SMTP id 124mr47463wmt.2.1457638088431; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 11:28:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.28.131.76 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 11:28:08 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <56E1C84F.9080805@gmail.com>
References: <56E13A19.8040800@cs.tcd.ie> <2071197074.5827045.1457618903225.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> <56E18406.7000705@labn.net> <56E1C84F.9080805@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 16:28:08 -0300
Message-ID: <CAKfZcEufm77oY6vMNMQsZw8i01hoS54EAh93EXdkTWa7SXz2Vg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Remote Hubs
From: Christian O'Flaherty <christian.oflaherty@gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/fGCo3LHL4ISBwFxNCg0jkOW93lg>
Cc: IETF Discussion List <ietf@ietf.org>, "vmeet@ietf.org" <vmeet@ietf.org>, Anand Raje <anand@rabt.in>, Christian O'Flaherty <oflaherty@isoc.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 19:28:11 -0000

On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 4:17 PM, Brian E Carpenter
<brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/03/2016 03:26, Lou Berger wrote:
>> On 03/10/2016 09:08 AM, nalini.elkins@insidethestack.com wrote:
>>>> 2. If people want to use the IETF logo to advertise that you can
>>>>> turn up somewhere and participate remotely in a session, and if
>>>>> nobody's trying to make money from the punters, I think we should
>>>>> allow and encourage such uses of the logo. I'd be happy to help
>>>>> annoy the trust to try get 'em to write down what's ok there, if
>>>>> that's not already being worked on by someone. (Or to encourage
>>>>> people to just use the logo like that and ask for forgiveness
>>>>> later:-)
>>> Stephen, it would be wonderful if you can ask the trust.
>>
>> Information on logo usage and how to request use of the IETF logo can be
>> found here:
>>
>> https://trustee.ietf.org/ietf-logo-acronym.html
>
> I suggest reading especially the section "What usage is OK without a license?"
> That was specifically intended to allow day-to-day use for descriptive purposes.
> IANAL, but I did draft that text ~10 years ago, and I think it would cover
> announcements of hubs.

so far the remote Hubs were informal

If we can consider them part of the IETF organization or its work we can use it:

"
4. What usage is OK without a license?

The IETF logo may be used, without modification, to accompany
descriptive text to refer specifically to the IETF organization itself
or its work.
"

In that case, we can remove the section from the draft


Christian



>
>> Sounds like you just want to fill out
>> https://trustee.ietf.org/docs/IETF_General_TM_License.pdf
>
> If you prefer an ink signature, sure.
>
>    Brian
>