Re: Nomcom off in the wilderness: Transport AD
Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com> Wed, 06 March 2013 22:39 UTC
Return-Path: <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3EDD21F8CDD for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Mar 2013 14:39:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.767
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.767 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.168, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ke9lc+TYEAYe for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Mar 2013 14:39:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qa0-f46.google.com (mail-qa0-f46.google.com [209.85.216.46]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 777B021F8CCE for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Mar 2013 14:39:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qa0-f46.google.com with SMTP id o13so2865970qaj.5 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 14:39:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=zrrWM5uQ7ualythkpFcM+qyZGNgM1Um2Tu+70ZqASvM=; b=PuUjT6RbIpzEvoO4DliC3oarLSfUu4/COutrmL56hkxm2IniCnKH2T+W3ypgQmzz/I yDkr4H+7FPno1ooYo9GVYaxwqOJ8Sb9TyMLo7bCytZVbepuI+iBM/icuV8Iep47Ul8Sw LBeOXU0kO5U+kkB9uXFvQQ0N0fNlKt4IhKDjudRhW7ibPicwDPUvs1UFoEXyiwShY7Zk w/jPYnyVd7SK8SE5J9bmXBQ87J301cFAVwhv4/NJwvaoBF29mFN9jHsP6yD4BGTKXlj2 1CSTb03oTVb/Er3CKMTOL5vEjCtQ5zi/v3Kj4IB1748XRcoQys1HrHfhWXMq3KKI4Iu9 Vsjw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.49.116.235 with SMTP id jz11mr24043735qeb.39.1362609539347; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 14:38:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.49.24.130 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Mar 2013 14:38:55 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <5137BCC1.4060204@wonderhamster.org>
References: <tslppzc3e9a.fsf@mit.edu> <51374B2F.6080603@dcrocker.net> <51377777.9060709@gmail.com> <51377E46.3000102@dcrocker.net> <4054D012A93F9CF579E493AC@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <5137BCC1.4060204@wonderhamster.org>
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 16:38:55 -0600
Message-ID: <CAHBDyN5aW3KKM64M3dRwD-yvW030S-vynSRVwuD+WCw-Uq7OXw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Nomcom off in the wilderness: Transport AD
From: Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
To: Spencer Dawkins <spencer@wonderhamster.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: IETF-Discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 22:39:25 -0000
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Spencer Dawkins <spencer@wonderhamster.org> wrote: > On 3/6/2013 3:11 PM, John C Klensin wrote: > > On this specific point ... > > >> Less likely, but still possible, a candidate may disclose >> (presumably with permission based on the Nomcom's >> confidentiality obligations when needed) truly confidential >> material such as future job prospects or even plans within the >> organization for which he or she currently works. Again, if the >> candidate can't be assured that information will be kept >> confidential, with no pressure to disclose, we essentially >> discourage candidates who have information of that type that >> then cannot be revealed to the Nomcom. > > > I've seen at least one Nomcom questionnaire that fell into this category, so > I's suggest that John's point is worth keeping in mind. [MB] I think that we can evaluate the questionnaires and decide how much of what is currently provided to Nomcom needs to be public. Just as there is a section where nominees can include information that doesn't get shared with IAB, they could certainly do so with information they don't want shared with the community. And, again, my suggestion was that this information only be available on the Nomcom wiki as is the public list of nominees, as opposed to publishing on an open website or mailing list. [/MB] > > Spencer
- Nomcom off in the wilderness: Transport AD Sam Hartman
- Re: Nomcom off in the wilderness: Transport AD Dave Crocker
- Re: Nomcom off in the wilderness: Transport AD Bert Wijnen (IETF)
- RE: Nomcom off in the wilderness: Transport AD Eric Gray
- Re: Nomcom off in the wilderness: Transport AD Sam Hartman
- Re: Nomcom off in the wilderness: Transport AD Dave Crocker
- RE: Nomcom off in the wilderness: Transport AD John C Klensin
- RE: Nomcom off in the wilderness: Transport AD Eric Gray
- Re: Nomcom off in the wilderness: Transport AD Donald Eastlake
- Re: Nomcom off in the wilderness: Transport AD Mary Barnes
- Re: Nomcom off in the wilderness: Transport AD Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Nomcom off in the wilderness: Transport AD Jari Arkko
- Re: Nomcom off in the wilderness: Transport AD Margaret Wasserman
- RE: Nomcom off in the wilderness: Transport AD Eric Gray
- RE: Nomcom off in the wilderness: Transport AD Eric Gray
- RE: Nomcom off in the wilderness: Transport AD Eric Gray
- RE: Nomcom off in the wilderness: Transport AD Eric Gray
- Re: Nomcom off in the wilderness: Transport AD Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: Nomcom off in the wilderness: Transport AD Dave Crocker
- Re: Nomcom off in the wilderness: Transport AD Mary Barnes
- Re: Nomcom off in the wilderness: Transport AD Melinda Shore
- Re: Nomcom off in the wilderness: Transport AD Dave Crocker
- Re: Nomcom off in the wilderness: Transport AD Bob Hinden
- RE: Nomcom off in the wilderness: Transport AD Eric Gray
- Re: Nomcom off in the wilderness: Transport AD Jari Arkko
- Re: Nomcom off in the wilderness: Transport AD John C Klensin
- RE: Nomcom off in the wilderness: Transport AD John E Drake
- Re: Nomcom off in the wilderness: Transport AD Mary Barnes
- RE: Nomcom off in the wilderness: Transport AD Eric Gray
- RE: Nomcom off in the wilderness: Transport AD John E Drake
- Re: Nomcom off in the wilderness: Transport AD Bob Hinden
- RE: Nomcom off in the wilderness: Transport AD Eric Gray
- Re: Nomcom off in the wilderness: Transport AD Mary Barnes
- Re: Nomcom off in the wilderness: Transport AD Henning Schulzrinne
- RE: Nomcom off in the wilderness: Transport AD Eric Gray
- Re: Nomcom off in the wilderness: Transport AD Stephen Farrell
- Re: Nomcom off in the wilderness: Transport AD Spencer Dawkins
- Re: Nomcom off in the wilderness: Transport AD Benoit Claise
- Re: Nomcom off in the wilderness: Transport AD Mary Barnes
- Re: Nomcom off in the wilderness: Transport AD Mary Barnes
- Re: Nomcom off in the wilderness: Transport AD Mary Barnes
- Nomcom is responsible for IESG qualifications Sam Hartman
- Re: Nomcom off in the wilderness: Transport AD joel jaeggli
- Re: Nomcom is responsible for IESG qualifications Dave Crocker
- Re: Nomcom is responsible for IESG qualifications Ted Hardie
- Re: Nomcom is responsible for IESG qualifications Dave Crocker
- Re: Nomcom is responsible for IESG qualifications Andrew Sullivan
- Re: Nomcom is responsible for IESG qualifications Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Nomcom is responsible for IESG qualifications Sam Hartman
- RE: Nomcom is responsible for IESG qualifications Eric Gray
- RE: Nomcom is responsible for IESG qualifications S Moonesamy
- Re: Nomcom is responsible for IESG qualifications Ted Hardie
- Re: Nomcom is responsible for IESG qualifications Spencer Dawkins
- RE: Nomcom is responsible for IESG qualifications Michael StJohns
- Re: Nomcom is responsible for IESG qualifications Mary Barnes
- Re: Nomcom is responsible for IESG qualifications Sam Hartman
- Re: Nomcom is responsible for IESG qualifications Spencer Dawkins
- RE: Nomcom is responsible for IESG qualifications Eric Gray
- RE: Nomcom is responsible for IESG qualifications Michael StJohns
- RE: Nomcom is responsible for IESG qualifications Eric Gray
- RE: Nomcom is responsible for IESG qualifications Michael StJohns
- RE: Nomcom is responsible for IESG qualifications Eric Gray
- Re: Nomcom is responsible for IESG qualifications Jari Arkko
- Re: Nomcom is responsible for IESG qualifications Dave Crocker
- Re: Nomcom is responsible for IESG qualifications Toerless Eckert
- The TSV discussion and its spinoffs (was: Re: Nom… John C Klensin
- Re: The TSV discussion and its spinoffs Sam Hartman
- Re: The TSV discussion and its spinoffs John C Klensin
- RE: Nomcom is responsible for IESG qualifications Eric Gray
- Consensus on the responsibility for qualification… Jari Arkko
- Re: Consensus on the responsibility for qualifica… Dave Crocker
- Re: Consensus on the responsibility for qualifica… Jari Arkko
- Re: Consensus on the responsibility for qualifica… Melinda Shore
- Re: Consensus on the responsibility for qualifica… Scott Brim
- Re: Consensus on the responsibility for qualifica… Michael StJohns
- Re: Consensus on the responsibility for qualifica… Scott Brim
- Re: Consensus on the responsibility for qualifica… Spencer Dawkins
- Re: Consensus on the responsibility for qualifica… Michael StJohns
- Re: Consensus on the responsibility for qualifica… John Leslie
- Re: Consensus on the responsibility for qualifica… James Galvin
- Re: Consensus on the responsibility for qualifica… Dave Crocker
- Re: Consensus on the responsibility for qualifica… James Galvin
- Re: Consensus on the responsibility for qualifica… SM
- Re: Consensus on the responsibility for qualifica… Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: Consensus on the responsibility for qualifica… Dave Crocker
- Re: Consensus on the responsibility for qualifica… Pete Resnick
- Re: Consensus on the responsibility for qualifica… John Leslie