IETF Logo Mail Archive

Old transport-layer protocols to Historic?

Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com> Thu, 06 January 2011 05:42 UTC

Return-Path: <evnikita2@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44FE53A6ED7 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Jan 2011 21:42:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.195
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.195 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.557, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.96, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h1sVD1Q-NaRG for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Jan 2011 21:42:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-bw0-f44.google.com (mail-bw0-f44.google.com [209.85.214.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03A513A6ED3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Jan 2011 21:42:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by bwz12 with SMTP id 12so16028912bwz.31 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 21:44:25 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type; bh=s0JrQ5JcklPrgYQNYz7G7w8SnyUWgDA8PnMmfv9vok8=; b=vhbY6duXq0IhQ25OD4QzSFA+zc/yUWsCTyZlGxMgAtmYZoeMGy3EGOMYLD2FuNLFsB cHtd9kDz5yR6N3Nufy1qXRHFawP+ryVM+Od4gtCFHRwJKY4PdkoevwGXV+uJr08jlywp 6/75ZvgV6GeRKC8EqTulSuYlb4duxdkJ2bDv4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type; b=L9UCzKt//bLCHmRU1hMXk3kmP1/njro+Fb7sXKSUF+5U9YK74yMklZE2OjfCfQSDlT 6RbrK0eIsAzTQju3ju7+IsAak427SGuU67c9tO1gJM1tHYfjxcIBkWA8Zqqk5gLTu08k RSQ8QkYtqMCg6O/wHt6aL7Ae+68QpfdwvGjJ8=
Received: by 10.204.98.201 with SMTP id r9mr6751097bkn.37.1294292664535; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 21:44:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([195.191.104.134]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p22sm13339246bkp.21.2011.01.05.21.44.23 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 05 Jan 2011 21:44:23 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4D2556C9.9020901@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 07:44:41 +0200
From: Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; ru; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Old transport-layer protocols to Historic?
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------000601000407040208030701"
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tsvwg@ietf.org, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 05:42:20 -0000

Hello all,

There have been a discussion on tsvwg mailing list about old transport 
layer protocols - exactly IRTP (RFC938), RDP (RFC908,1151) and NETBLT 
(RFC998). Initially there have been proposed to define IANA 
considerations for them. But after a discussion it was found out that it 
would be better to move them to Historic. I am writing to request more 
wider discussion on this topic.

There is quite strong consensus that IRTP should be Historic. There is a 
registered draft on this topic:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-yevstifeyev-tsvwg-irtp-to-historic/

But as for others it should be discussed. Moreover, maybe anyone knows 
some other old transport-layer protocols that are no longer in use?

Please copy tour answer to tsvwg@ietf.org

All the best,
Mykyta Yevstifeyev

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email