Re: Public musing on the nature of IETF membership and employment status

Dean Willis <dean.willis@softarmor.com> Fri, 09 April 2010 05:24 UTC

Return-Path: <dean.willis@softarmor.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48B5C3A65A6 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 22:24:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.374
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.374 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.225, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l7rmjreC-A4z for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 22:23:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nylon.softarmor.com (nylon.softarmor.com [66.135.38.164]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBF1E3A6AE7 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 22:23:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.103] (cpe-66-25-30-183.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.30.183]) (authenticated bits=0) by nylon.softarmor.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id o395MaMi003879 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 9 Apr 2010 00:22:38 -0500
Message-Id: <F78369AC-5AAD-4107-9597-59885CB3996F@softarmor.com>
From: Dean Willis <dean.willis@softarmor.com>
To: Stephan Wenger <stewe@stewe.org>
In-Reply-To: <C7E3BC56.20CC1%stewe@stewe.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="WINDOWS-1252"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Subject: Re: Public musing on the nature of IETF membership and employment status
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2010 00:22:31 -0500
References: <C7E3BC56.20CC1%stewe@stewe.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936)
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2010 05:24:01 -0000

On Apr 8, 2010, at 7:01 PM, Stephan Wenger wrote:

> Hi Fred,

> Would you really expect me not to throw my weight (assuming there  
> were one) behind the proposal I fought teeth and claws before—and  
> damage my relationship with my new employer during the first days on  
> the job?

Yep. If you did, most of the people I know around the IETF would never  
trust you again. Instead, we'd expect you to convert your new employer  
to your old way of thinking.

Either they're hiring because they think you're smart and they want  
your input, or they're hiring you to shut you up.

Are you getting  a paycheck from your employer, or are you taking a  
bribe? They aren't the same thing.

--
Dean