Re: "too many notes" -- a modest proposal
jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa) Thu, 26 January 2006 17:43 UTC
Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1F2B9S-0003j1-9W; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 12:43:18 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1F2B9O-0003hx-Iw for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 12:43:14 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA08035 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 12:41:38 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mercury.lcs.mit.edu ([18.26.0.122]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F2BAp-0005xL-4g for ietf@ietf.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 12:44:44 -0500
Received: by mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11178) id DA6C686AEA; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 12:34:11 -0500 (EST)
To: ietf@ietf.org
Message-Id: <20060126173411.DA6C686AEA@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 12:34:11 -0500
From: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: de4f315c9369b71d7dd5909b42224370
Cc: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: Re: "too many notes" -- a modest proposal
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
> From: "Anthony G. Atkielski" <anthony@atkielski.com> > Nobody constantly sends a long stream of consistently productive > messages. The irony in you, of all people, making this statement is a little stunning - to the point that one really does start to wonder exactly what could be behind your posting behaviour. Several possibilities come to mind, of course... > Well, there will always be more good engineers. In that case, there's no harm in the rest of us deciding we don't need the dubious "assistance" of few of the most troublesome, and least productive, is there? Noel _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
- "too many notes" -- a modest proposal Michael Thomas
- RE: "too many notes" -- a modest proposal Steve Silverman
- Re: "too many notes" -- a modest proposal Andy Bierman
- Re: "too many notes" -- a modest proposal Scott Kitterman
- Re: "too many notes" -- a modest proposal Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: "too many notes" -- a modest proposal Douglas Otis
- Re: "too many notes" -- a modest proposal Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re: "too many notes" -- a modest proposal Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re: "too many notes" -- a modest proposal Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re: "too many notes" -- a modest proposal Andy Bierman
- Re: "too many notes" -- a modest proposal Eliot Lear
- Re: "too many notes" -- a modest proposal Brian E Carpenter
- Re: "too many notes" -- a modest proposal Andy Bierman
- Taking a deep breath (was Re: "too many notes" --… Spencer Dawkins
- Re: "too many notes" -- a modest proposal Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re: "too many notes" -- a modest proposal Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re: "too many notes" -- a modest proposal John Levine
- Re: "too many notes" -- a modest proposal Noel Chiappa
- RE: "too many notes" -- a modest proposal Gray, Eric
- Re: "too many notes" -- a modest proposal Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re: "too many notes" -- a modest proposal Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re: "too many notes" -- a modest proposal Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re: "too many notes" -- a modest proposal Theodore Ts'o
- Re: "too many notes" -- a modest proposal Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re: "too many notes" -- a modest proposal Michael Thomas