Re: Next steps on re-organisation of areas
Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Thu, 19 February 2015 23:12 UTC
Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60D031A0371 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 15:12:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q1RwFcwf5ula for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 15:12:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC2C41A1A13 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 15:12:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D5A020012 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 18:20:16 -0500 (EST)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id DCB5F63A21; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 18:12:20 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6E40637F4 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 18:12:20 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Next steps on re-organisation of areas
In-Reply-To: <7FF71DAB-016C-4409-8A15-010D882BB889@ietf.org>
References: <7FF71DAB-016C-4409-8A15-010D882BB889@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.3-dev; GNU Emacs 24.4.2
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 18:12:20 -0500
Message-ID: <23326.1424387540@sandelman.ca>
Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/hrwhICKdek9_11E5V_gNsuGf9yc>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 23:12:23 -0000
IETF Chair <chair@ietf.org> wrote: > DESIRED EXPERTISE > Given the amount of work encompassed by real-time and non-real-time > applications, it is expected that the ART area will be initially > shepherded by the three area directors from RAI and APP who will be > serving on the IESG from March 2015. Going forward, we would expect ART > ADs to serve two-year terms as usual. I'm unclear if the ART area will continue with two or three ADs in 2016. Perhaps that is a TBD? > communities of interest. The ART ADs should make every effort not to > schedule DISPATCH and APATCH against each other at in-person meetings. APATCH sounds a lot like Apache (the "patchy" web server), so it will be funny for it to deal with HTTP extensions :-) -- Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
- Next steps on re-organisation of areas IETF Chair
- Re: Next steps on re-organisation of areas Michael Richardson
- Re: Next steps on re-organisation of areas Alissa Cooper