Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse

Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> Thu, 07 April 2016 03:47 UTC

Return-Path: <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8D5012D0B3 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 20:47:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xMs9Z30cSazy for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 20:47:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x243.google.com (mail-pa0-x243.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D07E12D0A3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 20:47:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-x243.google.com with SMTP id q6so5778074pav.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 06 Apr 2016 20:47:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=82KdsYDGZ8qPNZVVSPNR02FSR6L+YzHjlEJN7cMNRyI=; b=Nm1x26Rmtd/yp0EIkfnbnjrcD3qvWdOuc4z+xVJp7akAeU/gIyVqBLxb5XyFL5PGwv FMF8r4Xkp8tB/X7EXbN7q8VdH96EWRhnKQlGabm3pmRGjSjR7oscHHE34g6OH9tze9Bq GkNf7mapOKGsF9GUz/OifCKZGeq01niR0CrBZJMjBBh2CF/bn6av6+8PTW/dZR3JLq/+ HirO9NV+BNlKJzkngJZAiwAxPjbwHp6ambB8xvumZ9kbnqSxSxt7U/0NnVWCeoCoAyxi DMtfN+0TL3rrdX5z3u830Bji7kEMY8y+77Hz1jLwEeLF0Ocmoza2VHXgWuuA7Wf9v7zN 1Xwg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=82KdsYDGZ8qPNZVVSPNR02FSR6L+YzHjlEJN7cMNRyI=; b=MOmCClbaVR1FpsXhQ4lZboMngguXcC0/KINv7o20CDZDEP1Ao7aVyAoFCfPb1sUttR KFn2td5D6EMdTyo1BK3HP67gcsB90HAde5PHw4cAkjpTKfxfe3Topy/svt3QTnJCxbyV 7j/H6XqMzTwdzZ1ytnH3fwKOUiz/C5lzaCTJb9f0blzmDdR1FzMA0bf8WK1k4tthv+9L YwjNJkeS1rlgu6Pc9pW4kAUUnt85ihXtYZ4MpN72MU4KK3sDl67UT4m9AymF14RA3MWR 8+UO23o3g6S12IwnzJ0g6lnEBIZQveAIguyfzv3C3YLv81YrKDbm5qJMCUAtPoG1RBAv fLWg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLuoKpy3XJPuXozw8fAbRf+PdjxwAJl8yWhe9RqmL+Zeb19+0NANozWjp548kPNEA==
X-Received: by 10.66.160.7 with SMTP id xg7mr1471640pab.10.1460000835532; Wed, 06 Apr 2016 20:47:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Melindas-MacBook-Pro.local (74-124-96-91-radius.dynamic.acsalaska.net. [74.124.96.91]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id u64sm8000798pfa.86.2016.04.06.20.47.14 for <ietf@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 06 Apr 2016 20:47:14 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <09ff01d1905c$f15d4e70$d417eb50$@olddog.co.uk> <5705C39E.30807@dcrocker.net> <5705C837.5060000@gmail.com> <CAHkmkwuOxOnmJa7KOPdW0Fpqdoq2c7oKWmt9B+zvSy6WcCY5QA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5705D883.2090309@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 19:48:19 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAHkmkwuOxOnmJa7KOPdW0Fpqdoq2c7oKWmt9B+zvSy6WcCY5QA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/i1j7lb2ahttty7W2Stupxh83wdw>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2016 03:47:17 -0000

On 4/6/16 7:12 PM, Harish Pillay wrote:
> There are ongoing debates on withdrawing Section 377A and it
> will happen eventually. It is a matter of time.

Well, it was upheld by your courts as recently as late 2014, and
it is by no means the only anti-gay law on the books in Singapore.

Melinda