Re: tools forum idea for IETF 98

Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com> Thu, 09 February 2017 18:06 UTC

Return-Path: <akatlas@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFD5A129C3A for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 10:06:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iv4mwgpkCWXG for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 10:06:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wr0-x230.google.com (mail-wr0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26703129C3C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 10:06:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wr0-x230.google.com with SMTP id 89so89438916wrr.2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 09 Feb 2017 10:06:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=pRRn4xZeYW2KTzMHU4+mqURMukf1ItxlSdRy3ordaag=; b=r0AdA8qoVk54R3JLDKj3c6l1w2Z0AeN8ArKk91rJKdXqlhlVzW038Q57r8kgXaBsiq 0f7ucBSN/CuWwLOZ40UDoDIwbDKCFDFcbhQQ/n2K4Ksql6OgMIWa1ybHYRIXWSfyrFvf xo+0yeRd3Fhq5Zik/8fJnxsYC1T88IVTG4mjrrBtywwhgs49Z/oI8ZgCkAl9gLaD7Fbb V4USck0OPNnRgPDeYXYrUs9VD3mHyHrqGMsTr6lAakqIIzRDs7zI6ecjg+RJnPOWXQav nX2ItV85WNscq1vVvwlN5ZNqGALTePiIvqy/gH8CoRzAMsLoMt2MVxYT5a0nQaJAylee gj5w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=pRRn4xZeYW2KTzMHU4+mqURMukf1ItxlSdRy3ordaag=; b=rHQkh/aslZcVr9pVNA+Yhd2VWmwNGRKdrLNqZPkntZe6et0CrmSNkh7k1JU3OxZJTU hvcN7dZ7IpKUEweWW6cDf7mN5B/mC1NFMiAtxHtk77sSIQaypiuCLLKrrvEvdD8PMyWu woyaXKCJ61Gk1Lsmyolk0vH1X+kY+8iUZNT+n3JhXezrg4WibbQUAIr198xPjtmkTMZd srCh2hKl9JmDR1jAxGp4Iy71deVDkMrLo0Tx3m383qiztMK3kC3OcYa+FI2XT2go9E9o xkP6ekRbUcUXQg7QbIBzOT0+ULCiUzpTezevFMRCr9xhrHrqhpYirpff0+4ilcr/sZSh lwYQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39nArr4pMQgqlOxsp9dYWbNcMCfTS7wRRnpP7VU7ETm0hG/+YO5l+VzojHUbTVTn+xwKqb2N0YtbRjM8lA==
X-Received: by 10.223.147.225 with SMTP id 88mr4105648wrp.44.1486663593518; Thu, 09 Feb 2017 10:06:33 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.142.108 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 10:06:32 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <19251.1486663121@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
References: <CAG4d1re-o2jBJQhs+C51Xw-T1yV7UmQY86wrq0THikm6WDgQ1A@mail.gmail.com> <19251.1486663121@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
From: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2017 13:06:32 -0500
Message-ID: <CAG4d1resjBt_-Vou3Z26SvVUdD0Rj7WQt6kvydm1wbWFJspWkA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: tools forum idea for IETF 98
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c0df21c646f9e05481cd74c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/jUIqXK_XPiPwvWtR8QooOH91ltk>
Cc: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2017 18:06:38 -0000

Hi Michael,

On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
wrote:

>
> Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com> wrote:
>     > There have been some discussions about having a meeting at IETF 98 to
>     > discuss existing experimental tools and encourage discussion among
>     > those working on tools to handle specific issues. The basic meeting
>     > description is
>
> I'm excited by this.
> I probably know a dozen tools, but I don't know that I know about them.
> Or rather, I'm probably ignorant that others don't know about them :-)
>

Exactly - and for some of them, it has been a couple years at least where
the knowledge
and use isn't spreading organically.

Which tools are you thinking of?   Personally, I just started writing a
draft in markdown & then
discovered that the WYSWYG web translator isn't working for me and poking
at github led to lots of dependencies.

    > Agenda: 30 minutes of new tools lightning talks
>     > 60 minutes of small group discussion on different tool areas
>
> Scheduling for this might be difficult.
>
> Suggestion: once we get a few lightning talks in the "can", that each
>             WG chairs luncheon start with one such <5minute talk.
>

A goal of the small group discussion is to have folks find others
interested in the same
topic, understand what might be useful, and perhaps be motivated to do some
work on them
or volunteer to try them out as they are developed and so on.

So far, I've gotten a number of volunteers for lightning talks - certainly
more than 3 - and
a couple folks willing to facilitate small group discussion, but not
specific topics looking
like they have mass.   I'd be happy to see more discussion on this aspect.

I agree that scheduling is going to be tricky.  Options might include a
bring-your-own meal slot
or a before-dinner slot.  There's always scheduling it with lots of
conflicts like a non-WG-forming
BoF.

The audience isn't just WG chairs, of course, though I do hear your point
about having something
on-going about continuing tool experiments.  Let's see if this has enough
energy to try once and then see what makes sense afterwards.

Regards,
Alia




> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
>  -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
>
>
>
>