IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic (yet again)

Rémi Després <despres.remi@laposte.net> Wed, 27 July 2011 09:05 UTC

Return-Path: <despres.remi@laposte.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4930121F884F for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 02:05:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.935
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.935 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.014, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fRlaW54NbAVn for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 02:05:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp23.services.sfr.fr (smtp23.services.sfr.fr [93.17.128.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1BB521F8844 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 02:05:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from filter.sfr.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by msfrf2314.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 229F97000095; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 11:05:36 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.0.21] (per92-10-88-166-221-144.fbx.proxad.net [88.166.221.144]) by msfrf2314.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id A4DE17000094; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 11:05:35 +0200 (CEST)
X-SFR-UUID: 20110727090535675.A4DE17000094@msfrf2314.sfr.fr
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic (yet again)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Rémi Després <despres.remi@laposte.net>
In-Reply-To: <m2zkk0egxe.wl%randy@psg.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 11:05:35 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D56AC163-F4DF-484F-A249-F15966DFF2BC@laposte.net>
References: <13205C286662DE4387D9AF3AC30EF456D3F431D13B@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net> <m2zkk0egxe.wl%randy@psg.com>
To: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 09:05:37 -0000

Le 27 juil. 2011 à 01:54, Randy Bush a écrit :

> i do not care what the draft is called.
> i do not care whether it is info, experimental, or an IEN


> i do care that is says 6to4 MUST be off by default

+1
This is really what IETF has to say.

Everything else should better be limited to explanations.

RD

> 
> randy
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email