IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard

"Paul C. Bryan" <pbryan@anode.ca> Tue, 08 January 2013 01:33 UTC

Return-Path: <pbryan@anode.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EBCC11E80D7; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 17:33:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LHRa-LOgY6SK; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 17:33:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from maple.anode.ca (maple.anode.ca [72.14.183.184]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACA8211E80B8; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 17:33:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.126.22.206] (nat-204-14-239-210-sfo.net.salesforce.com [204.14.239.210]) by maple.anode.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 009E8699B; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 01:33:11 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-07.txt> (JSON Pointer) to Proposed Standard
From: "Paul C. Bryan" <pbryan@anode.ca>
To: Robert Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAChr6SyAq=7aQdZn54ihYK+0hDhL--2Oaq0RvehoNFbwKNNShA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20121211150057.28223.93310.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <50cb04b9.86df440a.72fe.1e20SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com> <CABP7RbeNsZ_rBWRjou=VG+hBhUKaOz+y1a0sSChwWiHte9znnQ@mail.gmail.com> <50cb5f3c.694c420a.38fb.39afSMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com> <CAChr6SxZRc3B_HCbw76kLe2dsRSr43r-gLpfMVnCUfJTrZdTLA@mail.gmail.com> <CABP7RbfA33huBFadMeXTTEt=MkjW8-d4DFH7+GLXGurnm9sSRw@mail.gmail.com> <CAOXDeqpPE4eNy_qJpDPdPHbCQakG9-hDcNZ3Sj9r4kWedByVzQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6SwtS_=iS-k4mJm1vHjEvvGVzay5jDYeGheqsPZqO-89CQ@mail.gmail.com> <EABB8F51-C3B4-49F5-8672-5C2ABAC7043A@mnot.net> <CAChr6Sx7JdKM91EwJaSZ0Ra_F4FSqkuc3vzTY1LM=F_8sWho+Q@mail.gmail.com> <1357515310.6827.23.camel@polyglot> <CAChr6SyAq=7aQdZn54ihYK+0hDhL--2Oaq0RvehoNFbwKNNShA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-I8ZK7EqkdsYa6okd4xdy"
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 17:33:10 -0800
Message-ID: <1357608790.27936.223.camel@pbryan-wsl.internal.salesforce.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 09:25:48 -0800
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 01:33:13 -0000

On Sun, 2013-01-06 at 16:01 -0800, Robert Sayre wrote:


> This last assertion really isn't qualified very well.


It would have been better for me to state this is my opinion, based on
discussions that were animated from similar objections raised in the
past. 

Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email