Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society

Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> Thu, 03 August 2023 08:56 UTC

Return-Path: <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABA59C15106B for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Aug 2023 01:56:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.091, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E8TbRZ12GdRs for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Aug 2023 01:56:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp [131.112.32.132]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 7FE8BC14F726 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Aug 2023 01:56:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 46282 invoked from network); 3 Aug 2023 08:55:04 -0000
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (131.112.32.132) by necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp with SMTP; 3 Aug 2023 08:55:04 -0000
Message-ID: <b883e2b3-a7be-8de0-2eae-22359d703ad4@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2023 17:56:16 +0900
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0
Subject: Re: Approaching the IETF - A View from Civil Society
Content-Language: en-US
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <20230802235348.37ED6FF611C0@ary.local> <784237fb-d190-90e7-abe4-c80e442f2379@huitema.net> <D5B0FCB1-078E-4410-BDE6-50AB52A4DD7F@istaff.org>
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
In-Reply-To: <D5B0FCB1-078E-4410-BDE6-50AB52A4DD7F@istaff.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/kfet_FfF0EMyD5ee31hD2vEsbcE>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF-Discussion. This is the most general IETF mailing list, intended for discussion of technical, procedural, operational, and other topics for which no dedicated mailing lists exist." <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2023 08:56:18 -0000

John Curran wrote:

> but I would note
> that there is rather significant prosecution efforts (and successes)
> today against CSAM production and distribution,

For amateur production and distribution, perhaps.

> Perhaps I misunderstood, and there’s a more coherent formulation of
> why countermeasures are likely to "to increase the distribution and
> production of CSAM and with it the number of victims” – if so, can
> you elaborate?

Because prosecution efforts against amateurs trading
CSAM purchased from commercial CSAM productions protect
business of CSAM industry.

						Masataka Ohta