Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis-01

On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 7:37 AM, Joel M. Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com>wrote:

> I am guessing that the authors intended the addition of the text
> emphasizing that the no-zone typedefs are derived general typedef addresses
> the difference in the patterns.
>
> Is there a YANG rule that says tat if typedef X is derived from typedef Y
> then the string for X must match the pattern for X and the pattern for Y?
>  If so, then my concern below is misplaced.  (The fact that I find the
> vague pattern for the child misleading is not a fault with the document,
> but rather in my head, under that requirement.)
>

Yes. RFC 6020, sec. 9.4.6.
All the patterns are ANDed together.

>
> Yours,
> Joel
>
>

Andy

> On 4/19/2013 6:24 PM, Joel M. Halpern wrote:
>
>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
>> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
>>
>> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/**area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>
>> >.
>>
>> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
>> you may receive.
>>
>> Document: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis-**01
>>      Common YANG Data Types
>> Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern
>> Review Date: 19-April-2013
>> IETF LC End Date: 1-May-2013
>> IESG Telechat date: N/A
>>
>> Summary: This document is nearly ready for publication as a Standards
>> Track RFC
>>
>> Major issues:
>>      (The following may well be a non-issue.)
>>      In the revision of the ietf-inet-types, the patterns for the new
>> ip4-address-no-zone and ipv6-address-no-zone are drastically simplified
>> from the ipv4-address and ipv6-address patterns.  The new
>> ipv4-address-no-zone allows any sequence of decimal digits an periods,
>> while the original was carefully defined as dotted quads of 0..255.
>> Similarly, te ipv6-address-no-zone allows any arbitrary sequence of hex
>> digits and colons.  The original patterns were very careful to match
>> rules for validity.  Is there a reason for the change.
>>
>> Minor issues:
>>
>> Nits/editorial comments:
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> Gen-art mailing list
>> Gen-art@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/**listinfo/gen-art<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>
>>
>>