IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: connection limits, was: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-24

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Wed, 30 October 2013 08:44 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34E6B21E80DA for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 01:44:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.163
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.163 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.564, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NW6qmFe+xmnu for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 01:43:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F18BF21E80C6 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 01:43:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([197.224.128.39]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r9U8gxk2013206 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 30 Oct 2013 01:43:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1383122608; bh=hpuZhCQ4L/AfhbimZ+CsWO1GWv+2yOgGF/LMxtG97Pg=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=TLd9SVczOxHzWyNE4/I0faM6mLK5X34Fa+0mYGfQk2zyju+lbARvHD86WjSIuqZgJ D5lkM9e2QZkaMhqF9xuXrVxMVvgOmgqVC4CTyfh3VkM5mbAdGTL8x1PBH3XezXjsIG mWwGCx9XBIPriOQYe0I8yCB8G6MDi+yKyN6FLZZU=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1383122608; i=@elandsys.com; bh=hpuZhCQ4L/AfhbimZ+CsWO1GWv+2yOgGF/LMxtG97Pg=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=4TDV0hM0Sj+x4YJ5bhp0+OoIbYbCI5jHoBIc0myqUAuGbvtCKvHJCWVWRrmFvOxa7 QDDcdBm0l7IYrrOY0eOImoTCxtsSY29uXAG0fTj/uYSWwWjWyVw2z9HqiNIYKKNjfW Pcv+8ALBuXysnipE0zZA68OLvY+KR/YKLBrMA/jY=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20131030011734.0ce8d178@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 01:31:27 -0700
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging.all@tools.ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Subject: Re: connection limits, was: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-24
In-Reply-To: <526FDC52.3030808@gmx.de>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20131026225145.0bee7bb8@elandnews.com> <526FDC52.3030808@gmx.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 08:44:01 -0000

Hi Julian,
At 09:03 29-10-2013, Julian Reschke wrote:
>I have trouble parsing this comment. Do you see an issue here?

I read the text again (Section 6.4).  It is difficult to say what is 
deemed abusive.  You could get around that with, for example:

   A client SHOULD limit the number of simultaneous open connections
   that it maintains to a given server as each connection consumes
   server resources.

Please note that I used some text from the third paragraph of that section.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email