IETF Logo Mail Archive

Registration requirements for transfer codings, was: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-24

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Mon, 28 October 2013 15:53 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84A7311E8123 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 08:53:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.664
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.664 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.065, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BCvnTy-VoELO for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 08:53:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96AA811E8160 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 08:53:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.102] ([217.91.35.233]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0ME47n-1VStpU2KCN-00HRi1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 16:53:31 +0100
Message-ID: <526E8878.5030903@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 16:53:28 +0100
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>, apps-discuss@ietf.org, draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging.all@tools.ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org
Subject: Registration requirements for transfer codings, was: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-24
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20131026225145.0bee7bb8@elandnews.com>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20131026225145.0bee7bb8@elandnews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:GtjsAsQSBG12szQraAuAVqDD6ILQ1EkUd8PodYJLAsgNbC5zuzD jPjPG7rTURE21Ttoa5xwp6GnRCMdwuLKERLoxFp7eaZ/bRCQuUyLa+ttGTJVH1U7Jgoixpy ii4zRvMx8y7+bQn5qQ+UwRzpQ9V6WmCbiIPKnd3R1rlYmPBqx4S7a6Wv84NQUzWziCS3OCL uzPmwJhqGNAsh7xeOuUpw==
Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 15:53:48 -0000

On 2013-10-27 19:44, S Moonesamy wrote:
> ...
> The HTTP Transfer Coding namespace (Section 8.4) is currently "First
> Come First Served".  The new registration procedure required IETF
> Review.  What is the reason for the change?
> ...

My understanding is that we wanted to set a high bar because this really 
ought to happen with lots of care and review.

The related ticket is 
<http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/188>, and it was 
discussed during IETF 75 
(<http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/minutes?item=minutes75.html>).

Best regards, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email