Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-opus-12.txt> (Definition of the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard
SM <sm@resistor.net> Mon, 30 April 2012 19:06 UTC
Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1FB221F8812 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 12:06:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.557
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.557 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.042, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xhpnRW0zN5dv for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 12:06:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48EC421F8809 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 12:06:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q3UJ5ws8006644 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 12:06:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1335812763; i=@resistor.net; bh=g8NVVc5XHRPqcKNd8ZBna9CoRAojwTKoh1FLTKvMYr8=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc; b=v3Xyuarii3G+r2fFSu2vFB4mmyBz8RZXqUKEUY2dPkWLNjhEk4hDXzMPVTw77h2h2 maM7853q1OccApfA906Ir+o969ZPxnUynIqyaZu644lotsrmHrR0nDidpOptINR+SH 7NLpYJfMvtrQToU/W9wWNkEss8nuRYX6ZWoGF9xI=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1335812763; i=@resistor.net; bh=g8NVVc5XHRPqcKNd8ZBna9CoRAojwTKoh1FLTKvMYr8=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc; b=mPqmESlud0BEdYRlT5yadKOQvDTJg5jov0JbQat3HtVQUUwf9d55RAzGFrvgyidga AwNVTBOttX8jwfv/Jwp6taSEAKRN01QItIE5utmf9cuSgPRWMOxjBaV/OG5c4o1GGF RR22Lnf8gJZbMh5UqqSw7FUy4JIl2KKiPhlgqnRQ=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20120430120153.0947ed48@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 12:05:39 -0700
To: ietf@ietf.org
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-opus-12.txt> (Definition of the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 19:06:08 -0000
At 13:20 26-04-2012, The IESG wrote:
>The IESG has received a request from the Internet Wideband Audio Codec WG
>(codec) to consider the following document:
>- 'Definition of the Opus Audio Codec'
> <draft-ietf-codec-opus-12.txt> as a Proposed Standard
Section 10 about "copying conditions" mentions "without
royalty". There was a message to the CODEC mailing list about the
Qualcomm IPR disclosure. The Licensing declaration in the Huawei IPR
disclosures do not mention royalty-free. Was that taken into account
by the authors for the statement in Section 10?
Could the authors please clarify what they mean by "the work" in the following:
"The authors agree to grant third parties the irrevocable right to
copy, use and distribute the work (excluding Code Components
available under the simplified BSD license)"
Regards,
-sm
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-opus-12.txt> (De… SM
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-opus-12.txt> (De… Stephan Wenger
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-opus-12.txt> (De… SM
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-opus-12.txt> (De… Ron
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-opus-12.txt> (De… Ron
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-opus-12.txt> (De… Sam Hartman