Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
Padma Pillay-Esnault <padma.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 11 October 2017 19:49 UTC
Return-Path: <padma.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76DA813307B; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 12:49:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AWGYrQaere_0; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 12:49:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22d.google.com (mail-wm0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43A291320CF; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 12:49:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id u138so7873475wmu.4; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 12:49:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=MzJzM2f0prtnowu+H/s6+7byUFMH4yEClyAZxsAk3AI=; b=f5N+SXiWJk6lUBogi14T3U4+rD/63qMDQLcwM57G6PDScD9zx16efd9Kf741Ip76Pv GAUAcPzrYUSNuPUwVKo9MKQJDWRapTNlGbc3qel77SmKbOlBMK5kjAZ8Pi4SUFq/LWCP 6/Ov1wvThR5pm5MrRAZ+0rBaH3cJJbxndps3ZoFRPhb/QixROO6gX78/52q/PZK8DkeK ccol+5+HEF1Y46nz5VhxSmGpeZWGO5/RPs5eXZePv4va0yT6tQEUahhx/7Ly8nWv/VMS 7SKTb/v+E+gtqB80RFg/iPUnzAQxHJ9FGhQ/iM5Shpdd5c1zKzmHvYAJu87eXWi+ybsx fzXA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=MzJzM2f0prtnowu+H/s6+7byUFMH4yEClyAZxsAk3AI=; b=DjUbzTYRZTa83o5AgVfkv9pCEKfEHMCcFfq4FZBO3ik68d7xBjfADFNhezcpsZcARC Bur8cv6Vv+tNOdXabCyoV9/VR1LYmbgqs0qwEbKZS8rXgmSQJhas6d8yI1J+8MVdl4s1 GK85WIgmtj1EFxeHWY+6zfiV9Cdx+Qjl0MIEyTmfFSEJ6A8qLbRl6Z0rqGmN9G6zyz8k TI+s/QDayP0YYoxQgy1grh/3O24TxaZgiR4cYBtc4KOw6ff9NL3dBs5uVLr93u4c32Yo j1h/mbLqKqE3BZ4PUSHmJtapgRxGZVLsqgXfRtk+Ogn6MhtbS3iQsrBM5oiKAuw9veOp //eA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaUlRrcgHSMwhI8f2qUjDu8SLSPftPSRmDloohK/0tVsKwZiyIaL vIz86MTzrs+5/9m1zFW3xc/qwmPcCtS18RY7gXg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QDvRNvkdyc9kfE45tMTCeyUKCITbQMzuQxZ/MRNL8z0Dimpx5VV6E2QeEaLkgTNdQweljeW9wjCKVJQAKaRDWE=
X-Received: by 10.223.199.15 with SMTP id k15mr99378wrg.111.1507751390728; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 12:49:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.173.86 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 12:49:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <666d4b84-72e6-8d5a-cc67-8c698d07c5b9@huitema.net>
References: <150670160872.14128.2758037992338326085.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20171007163002.11c897a0@elandnews.com> <CAG-CQxpnHKtov+pj6YFL0wxnO3YX7mbLUA9uHUkVQbHqE3A1rQ@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20171008102541.11499408@elandnews.com> <CAG-CQxpEb8Lcjy0M5445K4Ob+nQW15WeEooggcxpb=hToB4HZw@mail.gmail.com> <CALx6S372+69EkycAJ_y6b_rJnMw3ncFEZzhVFyWsA+3GbxHaZA@mail.gmail.com> <CAG-CQxpUKT9gt7ZggVPzWpxQjYfO2nzVzpmp-Dfsav7CKnmTQQ@mail.gmail.com> <01dd6551-16f6-46e2-e861-94285c160f35@gmail.com> <28999ddc-840a-30c6-5b22-bc9b2e06a2a7@htt-consult.com> <e34f2c28-f444-4b79-10d9-ea861a72e993@cs.tcd.ie> <bc66de9c-aa62-1433-fe93-64871dc5bb67@htt-consult.com> <666d4b84-72e6-8d5a-cc67-8c698d07c5b9@huitema.net>
From: Padma Pillay-Esnault <padma.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 12:49:49 -0700
Message-ID: <CAG-CQxrJvxK4O7ap9WckqPQSkp0OP0Wwvwvrd=3RU3Kr32Ytvw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas)
To: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>
Cc: Robert Moskowitz <rgm-ietf@htt-consult.com>, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>, ideas@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e0824490c0dd9ed055b4aba71"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/niWt_FlXdSk0pzsgRS4iRBhaPXE>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 19:49:57 -0000
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 9:19 AM, Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net> wrote: > > > On 10/11/2017 9:11 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > On 10/11/2017 11:20 AM, Stephen Farrell wrote: > > > On 11/10/17 16:12, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > And interesting that it seems there have been no major breachs of things > like SIM databases but ones with extensive PII have. > > https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/feb/19/nsa-gchq-sim > -card-billions-cellphones-hacking > > Admittedly quite a sophisticated attacker. > > > Well, that is a horse of a different color. > > > Don't forget that what the spooks can do today, the gangsters will do > tomorrow, and the high school kids not so long after that... > If we (community of IETF) decide no work should be done unless we have an absolute fool-proof system against insider attacks (which I do not believe we have an answer to that) or correlation by transitivity to humans then I would like to have some clarifications. The need for privacy is a given and no one is disputing that but where I struggle is in what context? (1) Discovery vs tracking What is considered discovery and what is considered tracking? If you can discover then you can track? So the only way is to access control the discovery and this is what this proposal is about! (2) Type of data, transitivity to human What type of data are we talking about here? Do we believe that having careful applications where encrypted sensitive data are not colocated with location information so that attacks will require multi-level attacks on multiple systems and cross-referencing a deterrent and good enough? If on top of that we have sensitive information (human) encrypted database with one way communications and changing identifiers etc etc as discussed.... is that a good start or not even close? (3) Tracking as a business model How about companies specialized with services of tracking and discovering things? Pet tracking ? How about the truck driver with assisted driving? Asset tracking as in bikes where people swipe a wireless card? How would this business model even work if they cannot recover their assets because we can track a person through transitivity? (4) Tracking who and by whom More concerning to me is that privacy is tricky, depending on the perspective... We want to protect the "good" guys but isn't that also enabling the privacy of the "bad" guys? Should the individual behind mirai bonnet attacks or gansters be entitled to privacy and non tracking? (5) Tracking is all evil? BUT then there is this annoying question that comes back to my mind .. do we EVER consider that human tracking is needed or beneficial? What about disaster recovery scenarios or emergency services or people who willingly want to participate in such a service? For example with an aging population, assisted living with monitoring health devices is a trend in the industry. These devices can be mobile. Not everyone can afford a caregiver full time ... So is it just going to be "no sorry ma'am someone may use this technology to do bad things with it?" It might be a matter of life and death to be able to track a person. The truth is that these services exist today outside of IETF technology and people are willingly subscribing to it because their priorities are different. While I completely agree we should be careful in what we do. Disclaimer trying to clarify how/where ideas is situated in all that? 1. It was not aimed for a wide scale deployed on the internet but it may be large enterprises. 2. It had no human info but it has been inferred this may be possible through transitivity 3. It has changing identifiers So we need protection - again no one disputes that ... if we have better technology let's integrate it. Let's not through the baby with the bathwater ... Padma -- > Christian Huitema > >
- Fwd: Re: WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (id… Christian Huitema
- Re: WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas) Stephen Farrell
- Re: Fwd: Re: WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks… Joe Touch
- Re: WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas) Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks … Tom Herbert
- Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks … stephen.farrell
- Re: WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas) John C Klensin
- Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks … Tom Herbert
- Re: Fwd: Re: WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks… Erik Nordmark
- RE: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks … Alexander Clemm
- Re: WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas) Eggert, Lars
- Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks … Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks … Dino Farinacci
- Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks … Stephen Farrell
- RE: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks … Uma Chunduri
- RE: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks … Padmadevi Pillay Esnault
- Re: WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas) Jari Arkko
- Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks … Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks … Tom Herbert
- RE: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks … Alexander Clemm
- Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks … Dino Farinacci
- RE: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks … Uma Chunduri
- Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks … Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks … Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks … Joel Halpern Direct
- Re: WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas) Mike StJohns
- Re: WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas) Phillip Hallam-Baker
- RE: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks … Uma Chunduri
- RE: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks … Uma Chunduri
- RE: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks … Uma Chunduri
- Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks … Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks … Leif Johansson
- Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks … Leif Johansson
- Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks … Padma Pillay-Esnault
- Re: Fwd: Re: WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks… Padma Pillay-Esnault
- Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks … Padma Pillay-Esnault
- RE: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks … Uma Chunduri
- RE: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks … Georgios Karagiannis
- Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks … Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks … Padma Pillay-Esnault
- Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks … Stephen Farrell
- RE: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks … Uma Chunduri
- Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks … Padma Pillay-Esnault
- Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks … Randy Bush
- Re: WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas) S Moonesamy
- Re: WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas) Padma Pillay-Esnault
- Re: WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas) S Moonesamy
- Re: WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas) Padma Pillay-Esnault
- Re: WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas) S Moonesamy
- Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks … Tom Herbert
- Re: WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks (ideas) Padma Pillay-Esnault
- Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks … Padma Pillay-Esnault
- Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks … Melinda Shore
- Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks … Brian E Carpenter
- RE: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks … Uma Chunduri
- Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks … Tom Herbert
- RE: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks … S Moonesamy
- RE: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks … Alexander Clemm
- Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks … Alvaro Retana
- Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks … Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks … Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks … Randy Bush
- Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks … Eggert, Lars
- Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks … Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks … Randy Bush
- Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks … Jeff Tantsura
- RE: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks … Uma Chunduri
- Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks … Randy Bush
- Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks … Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks … Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks … Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks … Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks … Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks … Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks … Christian Huitema
- Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks … Christian Huitema
- Re: [lisp] [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Ne… Padma Pillay-Esnault
- RE: [Ideas] [lisp] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Ne… Alexander Clemm
- Re: [lisp] [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Ne… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [lisp] [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Ne… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks … Padma Pillay-Esnault
- Re: [lisp] [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Ne… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [lisp] [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Ne… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks … Padma Pillay-Esnault
- Re: [lisp] [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Ne… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [lisp] [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Ne… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [lisp] [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Ne… Christian Huitema
- Re: [Ideas] [lisp] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Ne… Sam Sun
- Re: [lisp] [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Ne… Christian Huitema
- Re: [lisp] [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Ne… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [lisp] [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Ne… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [lisp] [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Ne… Randy Bush
- RE: [Ideas] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Networks … Georgios Karagiannis
- Re: [Ideas] [lisp] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Ne… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Ideas] [lisp] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Ne… Tom Herbert
- Re: [Ideas] [lisp] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Ne… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Ideas] [lisp] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Ne… Tom Herbert
- Re: [Ideas] [lisp] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Ne… John C Klensin
- Re: [Ideas] [lisp] WG Review: IDentity Enabled Ne… Toerless Eckert