IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Github, sanctions, and the IETF

Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> Wed, 10 August 2022 22:03 UTC

Return-Path: <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 860F6C13D06E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Aug 2022 15:03:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.855
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.855 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f2EKgM5VBbNy for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Aug 2022 15:03:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12d.google.com (mail-lf1-x12d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08FACC13CCE3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Aug 2022 15:03:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12d.google.com with SMTP id f20so23056502lfc.10 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Aug 2022 15:03:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc; bh=cKVXMBDaIwF9fYTGBEpdrpaFLUfg2S/CDffP3EvzwLw=; b=VD0GruaQEtADJ6mdjTg7HfhDhl3ASNlkC9sRruoI7aRZ0viVJgsqYYG0zC10GqQGwo rjE2eBb2RKIsspVLXe5iY2MtN7HELEtLnuTh3yOsikZ/MW7mdYjNnyGRhTV6waUBb+hA 02cg2N0wg/4i1PXKzT46ZlPrkhR56jg660Tu+ijBK2lQAT6cptpo9hlQEZHpFEY4DsTI oN5+SThNM6qpIAx19Wt7ViOFmOEdhNqZU7YS2eeXVlsVERzXydfmBdd/71Jp1O3z7zBc 6VgEh9m2wpvIgz2Ir4+xvj9l5eyBgd2la3QiskdJgS7vygXVXhW1F454cU5loyT6x1zk dLqg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=cKVXMBDaIwF9fYTGBEpdrpaFLUfg2S/CDffP3EvzwLw=; b=t4cYOtavpAEzT/ENY37qIG79Q6ToCoO7NZ75jglfrYxb3nE0dxD6mQy62n4AHwwhk1 QHsC1uKZIsXndmz8c4Hf0wSxDJZE0EL7gg92Z2uee4lTrZXcPN0AHl3+a6JrGWuwhItX OKVSabzygNj3jWxoY2xT9E3cpePDPT7fBgEZPLuYnFG2Z1VmHv4DF8X9jDY/JkXvIej1 wzZUZAbtSeaAwD1ufZ3nhcxfWCDWkCwLmYWaLrdzyT1ea9fZuJ06FfSRItyadKgFm/+d BsJf5NEuhVrBiVqPSPkc9WpvJvVEYBjFukEhG8mb71DoXT6EBF+uIz3ek+z8Bz4EO//N 79Pg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo2tJKUwFMW64D4CKulcKmDWbA5NyXT0IdqGSrFkoOKz92Qj4/Rc n8a+SVypkUx0Q2diIS6SRCFldk24ZntDkdFhfL0E/xoA
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR5mm8iqcf/ZPEYxC4W8aa4kj4JxAF524+/FDuD4Iz//FKbolk0Cz0uea1Eerly1dE81LCXywkx7vPW0JZT3YvI=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3d25:b0:48b:562:162d with SMTP id d37-20020a0565123d2500b0048b0562162dmr9339009lfv.684.1660169006242; Wed, 10 Aug 2022 15:03:26 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <953c702b-2055-5e0c-115e-6bcc923834d4@gont.com.ar> <C6C567A0-9D9D-4AAB-B174-132D75E75553@yahoo.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <C6C567A0-9D9D-4AAB-B174-132D75E75553@yahoo.co.uk>
From: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 18:03:14 -0400
Message-ID: <CAF4+nEFBt9C3tNJwVRtmFqENc6pwZqfYMGfZNbj-0CcZkRbxwA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Github, sanctions, and the IETF
To: ietf@ietf.org
Cc: Lloyd W <lloyd.wood=40yahoo.co.uk@dmarc.ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/oTgnZAlgQIRaXgBJpBnPR28bRkI>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 22:03:32 -0000

I agree with Lloyd.

Thanks,
Donald
===============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA
 d3e3e3@gmail.com

On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 5:29 PM Lloyd W
<lloyd.wood=40yahoo.co.uk@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
> not formally, since the outputs of the git wg were informational.
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/git/documents/
>
> as revision control systems go, git seems to me to be spectacularly ill-suited to the IETF and editing of text documents, rather than for the kernel source tree it was designed for.
>
> git is in fashion, and fashions pass.
>
> Lloyd Wood
> lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk
>
> On 11 Aug 2022, at 04:58, Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar> wrote:
>
> Hi, All,
>
> Since we seem to have formally embraced Github, this might be of interest: https://cryptobriefing.com/circle-github-comply-with-tornado-cash-sanctions/
>
> P.S.: No, I don't have a specific proposal. -- although nothing would prevent us from e.g. running gitlab ourselves, I guess -- still, not sure the extent to which we'd be relieved of the same issues (as previously discussed in other threads).
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Fernando Gont
> e-mail: fernando@gont.com.ar
> PGP Fingerprint: 7F7F 686D 8AC9 3319 EEAD C1C8 D1D5 4B94 E301 6F01
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email