Re: [107attendees] Where the action is, at virtual meetings ...

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Sun, 29 March 2020 18:20 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23E9B3A0829 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 Mar 2020 11:20:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WZh0fD7rVNtr for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 Mar 2020 11:20:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82f.google.com (mail-qt1-x82f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 765293A082A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 29 Mar 2020 11:20:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82f.google.com with SMTP id a5so13218222qtw.10 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 29 Mar 2020 11:20:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:subject:date:message-id :references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=eqtuJf8nc5IvcY4dpcnKyVdzoJQL3RHnCNQDFlXcZeE=; b=wPMCd+Z/Bfq9mJQpHrE/Wraujvd4fZPx2O4ouUPAb5iFOJEs8zesY1k64UYqCyWHIR 5pO85G6jGN3EC4rT1Laijp+IbAiI4SVTPRyf8qm3oqqpqqGvEmdA64vEroyA7C7zbgzb XgbAnma13p7qwRvDr+Tf9mXV5BDgniL8uhzCuUuonaiM7Zp786vVe9dJdPQKSuoQAMTA VsXvcfiq26LeKkaARY76Nb9d3TvZkACspx8+EYQL2N4PdONdbrFtrcgrJIrDN1vcChB3 RE/2G9uHUSaTY4Jdiz/+53a/JxmR+x0eCqq6KbWeK8UXK5Cyw1uRbe261EX5KhrJBkRu bdWQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version :subject:date:message-id:references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=eqtuJf8nc5IvcY4dpcnKyVdzoJQL3RHnCNQDFlXcZeE=; b=RtBCFwH1fB8MO6BakDVOyhmzPS0dErBWvYMV31KDUV8D5AdPgShZaT8VgjhlLmJDv8 3uSL5IWSe0p0ckDkF/+q0DEp3FEgt7eRNk6ETN5PHEsl0iZwnSs6EY97PT4qUQhXonLh 68kMbAr2Or2LIdb5nVumwqR/yGxxZ0yiCNaG5xrstn9EaVkyjrrPdAQ7qRaKNjGwMSyg NAw2qRK0EhhTqkRmuB7HNIf2Xdez0o8deNKseBCgIigG7i+MAGj1+Y18pTQn8NOGrAKe 3rN4G3A58sIsrtIe2UMAasBF6LsEzQ237Kj9sAdTvlmmX4+SJRacpqcRU34HVT/gort6 YHyQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ3o5hsMTFOZl8Vo0TMJdgWkjo25nx/WmiLr3h0S1k8xY7g/H7XJ gfAV9juUV/kr2LF+4aTZOziyGg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vsK4Z3l/c5JvPuyZoCbtwgjYTBDYBu/h01O7Bc4hehHFFbb+/tBTtJFyWUeOqL6HCJOR+DGgw==
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:138c:: with SMTP id h12mr8182972qtj.210.1585506044275; Sun, 29 Mar 2020 11:20:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:18b:300:36ee:5ce8:b94e:ead6:c904? ([2601:18b:300:36ee:5ce8:b94e:ead6:c904]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s63sm8395379qkh.64.2020.03.29.11.20.43 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 29 Mar 2020 11:20:43 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: [107attendees] Where the action is, at virtual meetings ...
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2020 14:20:42 -0400
Message-Id: <444FE124-7ADC-4B47-9B8A-028E5334D973@fugue.com>
References: <FC04F89A-9B0E-4319-ABFA-3C8F3048477C@bangj.com>
Cc: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>, 107attendees@ietf.org, Carrick Bartle <cbartle891=40icloud.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Puneet Sood <puneets=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Robert Moskowitz <rgm-ietf@htt-consult.com>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <FC04F89A-9B0E-4319-ABFA-3C8F3048477C@bangj.com>
To: Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17F35)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/okmvOsfxmeCA2RuoAViCFeDePdo>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2020 18:20:47 -0000

Slack history is kept if you pay them. If we use slack we should do that. If you use a weird browser, it’s not that hard to tweak the browser type string. Much like if you run 4 different MUAs, you will have to make some accommodation. 

> On Mar 29, 2020, at 13:38, Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> On Mar 29, 2020, at 12:55 PM, Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi> wrote:
>> 
>> Ted Lemon writes:
>>>   And each Jabber client is different in how it takes info to open a
>>>   conversation.  Pidgin did not work with what was there.  So a lot of work
>>>   will be needed here.  Maybe a new protocol?
>>> 
>>> Slack works orders of magnitude better than jabber for this.  If we don’t want
>>> slack, then we need better jabber.   Slack is a really easy solution to the
>>> problem, though—I don’t think better jabber is worth spending time on,
>>> honestly.
>> 
>> Slack does not work with any of the browsers I use (seamonkey). It
>> simply returns page saysing "This browser is no longer supported".
>> Yes, I know I can get it working if I simply find out what is the
>> exact string it wants to have in the User-Agent header, and change my
>> browser to fake the User-Agent header and send that exact string, but
>> it is bit annoying, as almost every time when I need that feature, I
>> need to google up that string to see what it is they need this week.
>> 
>> Of course as they are using standard html stuff anyways everything
>> works fine with my browser after faking UA, it is just that they do
>> not want people to use any other browsers than those 4 approved ones.
>> 
>> Earlier they did just say your browser is no longer supported, are you
>> sure you want to continue, and then you could click "yes, go forward",
>> but they stopped doing that few years back. That just indicates the
>> attitude the developers have, meaning we do not care what you want, we
>> do things as we like to do things, and there is nothing you can do for
>> that.
>> 
>> So using pidgin to use jabber is much easier for me than using slack.
>> With jabber I needed to set up pidgin settings once, I do not need to
>> redo settings every single ietf.
>> -- 
>> kivinen@iki.fi
> 
> For me, most of these solutions are missing searchable archives. This is built in to email. In the past, the IETF has published the jabber logs and I have written scripts to sync them with audio and slides. Slack limits history in most cases I’ve used it.
> 
> Any solution going forward should have:
> 
> 1. history is kept forever
> 2. easily searchable.
> 3. timestamps for synchronization
> 4. source of message can be correlated to IETF person database
> 5. archive available in standard format (no HTML screen scraping please. Yeah, I know, Beautiful Soup is amazing, but I have better things to do.)
> 
> Tom
> 
> 
> 
> 
>