IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: New Version Notification for draft-resnick-variance-00.txt

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Sun, 29 March 2020 19:40 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A78233A0C39 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 Mar 2020 12:40:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.802
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.802 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oyj2aTs8nw85 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 Mar 2020 12:40:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x636.google.com (mail-pl1-x636.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::636]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7F833A0C38 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 29 Mar 2020 12:40:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x636.google.com with SMTP id g2so5840187plo.3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 29 Mar 2020 12:40:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xKUJKYwELw2oKLTP1jMCU7K/HhkW2p0MPDAZzodnr1o=; b=j0HPWkT0W9byPQGDO7dmtSzIEiUSqHKquRkhl5+q3XnPdUTu88It0P4s6zthtL6T3x DLXSQWXUxLqGWpjmSuDx32XK3c1afBpzJShEJfCLlUuRjTfVDon3tMVfe8hGRUiV/DaP kmyx+KvnUyKABzYLVjBYhDxXU6Pbljp35DGPTzKyW6erts7WwcuRvbi31BgSz1AvNeqa RqloQDPU/r0fIg3R2iOkYJxL89VCcp/QqgXwF3kuUchCvT0FzxqOHn3LGVwVcbloOl3d LNqudjd8v8yjI9RzYnantLg5hTVOiDm0DhObjQyMlLH9fam4TwvQQ46zcZdJhDKI9A1m N4Dw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=xKUJKYwELw2oKLTP1jMCU7K/HhkW2p0MPDAZzodnr1o=; b=PHPwlgQYMJCeymXRpL2lfd2WWebpjiD1t7I4cwERV6dLdIUZIbHqXZgycTNCztjjlD RC+Y91Ls6R/YNfPlOO7e+6YKzCRgMGp2f1YeJvZMkipKqJCRRc1E7sxV+MtFLtu0Zz76 XD8R8WM3lRyVDh6WyttJUPv7BECm3dPMtZVTscZptq5dfpPYBsluCbD0FoRuUPdlb3RL hKgYyUlm3+Rz17SGo3caN1Qct2wvKJ+p2tJkQLNVhaUw6z0XdAwKkrRIm5bRsghJiHTZ xR0KqQYQBzMlJ2JwkECW9BvyLcVUhlbrSdsvLCIJVL8XOszX+uUVgxyakf+CF656nIPS EuZA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ19PPhNiFGEgBt8Mi/D4Hqe9lFsFnDKkLM3LI6wtGgHw2/SN4su Nhchcj9wTv0h06RPw+xYJRfXK6DX
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vv7u6yP4d3TBfY0iQbDxz6eAStKD8M768OqhXiD2caVrrbPxGFKwmSCgI0cQ65xWntQgeWC1g==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:24c5:: with SMTP id i63mr11759815pje.177.1585510854754; Sun, 29 Mar 2020 12:40:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.30] ([165.84.25.143]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r63sm8732016pfr.42.2020.03.29.12.40.52 for <ietf@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 29 Mar 2020 12:40:54 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: New Version Notification for draft-resnick-variance-00.txt
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <158533925458.17797.13806166303625482245@ietfa.amsl.com> <AE66200A-E718-4BF6-BA87-EE427A0BF971@episteme.net> <0e9e0a5f-5022-9a06-b8be-46d922f31aa7@nostrum.com> <4f79a660-2268-dad0-e796-dc1fabfcf73d@network-heretics.com> <A2B6BC2A-5983-48D9-BF0E-F782BBA54004@episteme.net> <0b518909-d421-afe7-b473-3d7ea3b04648@network-heretics.com> <CAC4RtVA1j4vSCvgWstnajveAqgWYvu19UDSNKBagk3XjfDM=2A@mail.gmail.com> <BC8D550D8EAE709FCA831F67@PSB> <999AA8E7-C6E3-4CE0-9F80-ACA40EAD26A3@episteme.net> <CAKKJt-fxHmHaZMMChk1q3QBHgb4czi9c5zK6TVwia8Tm=g0Kyw@mail.gmail.com> <CAJc3aaPa75YAotm5rY9ebrKVYVaw=rDJYGQQLETvjnaugxGmkQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1414d8af-fcc0-7a1a-0c63-ba26188c7897@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 08:40:49 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAJc3aaPa75YAotm5rY9ebrKVYVaw=rDJYGQQLETvjnaugxGmkQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/cn0FC8QXEdKmXTRXkhoD1Ee__Ks>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2020 19:40:57 -0000

On 30-Mar-20 05:22, Victor Kuarsingh wrote:
> 
> 
> On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 11:24 AM Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com <mailto:spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>     On Sat, Mar 28, 2020, 15:51 Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net <mailto:resnick@episteme.net>> wrote:
> 
>         On 28 Mar 2020, at 15:15, John C Klensin wrote:
> 
>         > (I think some
>         > variation on Pete's draft is a good idea for multiple reasons,
>         > but  this is not the time and doing it in haste would be
>         > unwise.)
> 
>         I have no problem putting that document on ice for a while. It was an
>         attempt to come up with a way to avoid publishing a BCP for the
>         2020-2021 NomCom (or any) variance. But it already sounds like people
>         would want more time to ponder the limits of it or be convinced that
>         it's actually a good idea, so it's unlikely to get published in time for
>         it to make a difference.
> 
> 
>     I was somewhat surprised that this draft went beyond the immediate question of 2020/2021 Nomcom eligibility, so if we address only that question as a one-time exception, and then return to the general question, I'd be ok with that.
> 
> 
> I think having the variance short lived makes sense and allows us to both deal with the immediate situation and give us some time to close any process or documentation gaps. 

Sure, but we could do a one-time variance as a BCP inside 6 weeks if people are sensible. (A few days to draft it, 4 week last call, a few days to finalise the text, run the IESG ballot, and one-day turnaround at the RFC Editor.) We are supposed to be a can-do organisation.

   Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email