IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: New Version Notification for draft-resnick-variance-00.txt

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Sat, 28 March 2020 16:22 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 130373A003B for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 28 Mar 2020 09:22:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qlBxZeeCsngG for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 28 Mar 2020 09:22:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30E253A03EE for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 28 Mar 2020 09:21:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12C2495F; Sat, 28 Mar 2020 12:21:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 28 Mar 2020 12:21:58 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=K62CE2kuBwB61N0SrXlCGpLbxeGKamtpreIhCl4hd mo=; b=ImvboKI26MxvLALm6zkQSHNbTZXEhjAIOZekOFnERdvh3xg3svW55r+9a pqf8HIf9kTT92lQnYpBehUh0Y3eZ/2Ci4UKKkzRmeG6wDdEBZ4o/gF9irODHlCZU T0izH/alrTPjOgB5vcXS7SDIfasCnReoew3Ukcgwh67x/ZECh2R9M5Wsw2rLWOnZ 2MYtRYlARvhZy2Xe6FuyqCbAZjwQp3Z3j89LpVLvr972ZqrJJfUrJY0b8NHXEF2q 0hftbAJYWYtzvD6EpPMSRLj1cCBKLKbibl8FRpdfCnpNbwXpM+WmUyJOU+9okpnf XDLH5+gGCpnKHLB9N4+Sz9y6uKjkw==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:pXl_XmEPvc5fM40TNqOjSK8N7I2yYrzzd7sdpX658aOpEtOw-Su--Q>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrudeiuddgkeeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefuvfhfhffkffgfgggjtgfgsehtke ertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpefmvghithhhucfoohhorhgvuceomhhoohhrvgesnhgvthif ohhrkhdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtohhmqeenucfkphepuddtkedrvddvuddrudektddrud ehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhho ohhrvgesnhgvthifohhrkhdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtohhm
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:pXl_XgFO5cp3ApvXFnXrrthKxwqF53yvwp-I5Siasl1xMw0L5nz-6A> <xmx:pXl_Xu07QnnOIFjQv0POwJc6A5hA_4odjaF4YwJQ26MFp97XL9jvZQ> <xmx:pXl_XicJoUmOcJG9ihvg5X2B8CLH422zQ7wZJ9Q8-rH2-ynZzkpKVQ> <xmx:pXl_Xj1rXhj4_VaaAT_WK8KegzTmMIBas8OQAzyAt6Hb2kH2YHfx3w>
Received: from [192.168.1.97] (108-221-180-15.lightspeed.knvltn.sbcglobal.net [108.221.180.15]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id F241A3280059; Sat, 28 Mar 2020 12:21:56 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: New Version Notification for draft-resnick-variance-00.txt
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <158533925458.17797.13806166303625482245@ietfa.amsl.com> <AE66200A-E718-4BF6-BA87-EE427A0BF971@episteme.net> <0e9e0a5f-5022-9a06-b8be-46d922f31aa7@nostrum.com> <4f79a660-2268-dad0-e796-dc1fabfcf73d@network-heretics.com> <A2B6BC2A-5983-48D9-BF0E-F782BBA54004@episteme.net> <0b518909-d421-afe7-b473-3d7ea3b04648@network-heretics.com> <CAC4RtVA1j4vSCvgWstnajveAqgWYvu19UDSNKBagk3XjfDM=2A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Message-ID: <49e1c75b-3831-e788-a4b0-6a8ad8ea7ab4@network-heretics.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 12:21:55 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAC4RtVA1j4vSCvgWstnajveAqgWYvu19UDSNKBagk3XjfDM=2A@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/ariWDtAGBBYF84ddLpwP9z1UPXA>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 16:22:01 -0000

I see your point but think that the action should be published in an RFC 
regardless of how it's made and I think the means of taking the decision 
need to respect RFC 2026 as much as possible given the constraints.   
However, I don't think it's necessary to wait for publication of the RFC 
before seating the nomcom.

Keith

On 3/28/20 10:20 AM, Barry Leiba wrote:
> Please advise how you think we can get the NomCom eligibility question
> sorted out IN TIME to seat a 2020-21 NomCom, when we normally need to
> ask for volunteers within the next 6 weeks.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email