IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: New Version Notification for draft-resnick-variance-00.txt

"Scott O. Bradner" <sob@sobco.com> Sat, 28 March 2020 20:37 UTC

Return-Path: <sob@sobco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15EB03A0CF6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 28 Mar 2020 13:37:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pQUr08_0ADI4 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 28 Mar 2020 13:37:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sobco.sobco.com (unknown [136.248.127.164]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6924C3A0C3A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 28 Mar 2020 13:37:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sobco.sobco.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C2A731398B2; Sat, 28 Mar 2020 16:37:54 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at sobco.com
Received: from sobco.sobco.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (sobco.sobco.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SK8wXwIvXR4i; Sat, 28 Mar 2020 16:37:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.50.224] (173-166-5-67-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.166.5.67]) by sobco.sobco.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3BB78313989F; Sat, 28 Mar 2020 16:37:53 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Subject: Re: New Version Notification for draft-resnick-variance-00.txt
From: "Scott O. Bradner" <sob@sobco.com>
In-Reply-To: <2784d40b-618a-7201-2209-cfdd4630fa39@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 16:37:52 -0400
Cc: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, ietf@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <250C86A5-479E-4E65-904F-3FB7C4E40571@sobco.com>
References: <158533925458.17797.13806166303625482245@ietfa.amsl.com> <AE66200A-E718-4BF6-BA87-EE427A0BF971@episteme.net> <0e9e0a5f-5022-9a06-b8be-46d922f31aa7@nostrum.com> <4f79a660-2268-dad0-e796-dc1fabfcf73d@network-heretics.com> <A2B6BC2A-5983-48D9-BF0E-F782BBA54004@episteme.net> <0b518909-d421-afe7-b473-3d7ea3b04648@network-heretics.com> <CAC4RtVA1j4vSCvgWstnajveAqgWYvu19UDSNKBagk3XjfDM=2A@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20200328123608.1187e9c0@elandnews.com> <2784d40b-618a-7201-2209-cfdd4630fa39@gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/gPz7XTo8y0drqb6Wgs9zKrJ0QBU>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 20:37:58 -0000


> On Mar 28, 2020, at 4:19 PM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
…

> 
> The NomCom Chair has not been appointed, and is subject to the same eligibility rules as the volunteer pool. At the moment, the ISOC President cannot appoint a chair because he cannot know who is eligible. So we are in a vacuum until the IESG exercises its judgement. (Which is why I don't think we should go the draft-resnick-variance route.)
> 
> Stay well,
>    Brian
> 

actually, there is a significant pool of people that qualify even if one assumes the the last meeting did or did not happen
(i.e. people who had been at 3 of the  4 meetings 103, 104, 105 & 106) you would lose some people that were at only 
two of those meetings and were at meeting 102 or meeting 107 (depending on how the decision comes out) but  the 
ISOC president could move ahead if he wanted to 

Scott

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status