IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: New Version Notification for draft-resnick-variance-00.txt

Victor Kuarsingh <victor@jvknet.com> Sun, 29 March 2020 16:22 UTC

Return-Path: <victor@jvknet.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FB833A0D8D for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 Mar 2020 09:22:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.004
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.004 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=jvknet-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PQrdKBPT5Oz7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 Mar 2020 09:22:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x32d.google.com (mail-wm1-x32d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 481D23A0D98 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 29 Mar 2020 09:22:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x32d.google.com with SMTP id z14so1306779wmf.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 29 Mar 2020 09:22:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jvknet-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Ilj3KTJUIci4OpJW3aCtxKM+OSytVzUNZo8oyJDgHpU=; b=tINKMn4K1dh+bcl6q8fZDE8hGk6jPbFdRsozxx3jbqWBzzJFgO3zbHPO0WrY70EkxE +y/NOZAhok5hQuTt+qfYKpBe9HUojZ4xVYL3Wf3y/1vTcAGPzVut2LTDSdDVKHbhej9K PG7aOs8V3cyFs63V8jpbgIQH1yYy3+hAfWWk6oMjpCdfJRXYaZCAEdQcbz8Gf4DvobSr Gw4mVoGOMUBgZ6M/dr415rquSI8qMiLwLd9kCDTYOTNIKjC5ui60UyicUaCLS3oWPDIr eeiir8od9f2lyx8QQxRwLfnDnVYNS7lyU8owCFUPvN3tIzZf0MCg2CgYBPGUAYmfiaSI C+mQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Ilj3KTJUIci4OpJW3aCtxKM+OSytVzUNZo8oyJDgHpU=; b=c/m2tWC8NHI+0nLb42LUzMXBu4gEPANV3JzcceDmNEE9LKZ/2IwJPHcWUE31x+qiU5 0RNJWl+piHaWsrPJmlbtjPOF+d6j4IEfVS8GSh/xypYLMU73ScOM2FAXHAEcRG2w2DjO Rf3718p7aNh4HhjsHu8ih5pmb0mNYVie215ia9PghiunlrFzm5U/NIu6vK3zjGnq7KOw ck7vEUC5yQPtC3YzxbjHJM2IOFjGUdmeB5a6GaL74NXZvH47sFUrBvgPlh3Ir/L1YEzH CuQzTq64t4SwKm5UJpzxjdSRCzHzgaD+5ymO6QXonBR023stYiFoj7Adf/H1C6ykHVQf 5Lqg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ3y8OICjiM48KtOitJUxlKN/YrAdCPWH+RdQYtx6BJ0mI3ZDwPF YDdcB0S52+eeZufIf/Hxf4GZ3NV0nJbi4gmjGdz/yA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vuxn2FmjsBQ1K+65FRQhBuJc+hQO+Oe3GL/Ubo0FgT3RROgufwgIOB9JV/GE0bvJ7bCwuzdGuZurfLE3gm9hyo=
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:8097:: with SMTP id b145mr9357427wmd.159.1585498946398; Sun, 29 Mar 2020 09:22:26 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <158533925458.17797.13806166303625482245@ietfa.amsl.com> <AE66200A-E718-4BF6-BA87-EE427A0BF971@episteme.net> <0e9e0a5f-5022-9a06-b8be-46d922f31aa7@nostrum.com> <4f79a660-2268-dad0-e796-dc1fabfcf73d@network-heretics.com> <A2B6BC2A-5983-48D9-BF0E-F782BBA54004@episteme.net> <0b518909-d421-afe7-b473-3d7ea3b04648@network-heretics.com> <CAC4RtVA1j4vSCvgWstnajveAqgWYvu19UDSNKBagk3XjfDM=2A@mail.gmail.com> <BC8D550D8EAE709FCA831F67@PSB> <999AA8E7-C6E3-4CE0-9F80-ACA40EAD26A3@episteme.net> <CAKKJt-fxHmHaZMMChk1q3QBHgb4czi9c5zK6TVwia8Tm=g0Kyw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKKJt-fxHmHaZMMChk1q3QBHgb4czi9c5zK6TVwia8Tm=g0Kyw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Victor Kuarsingh <victor@jvknet.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2020 12:22:15 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJc3aaPa75YAotm5rY9ebrKVYVaw=rDJYGQQLETvjnaugxGmkQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: New Version Notification for draft-resnick-variance-00.txt
To: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net>, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007e02f205a200bd4d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Nf75gC9n2Md3hoQr6d3Kj10FN9U>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2020 16:22:31 -0000

On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 11:24 AM Spencer Dawkins at IETF <
spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Sat, Mar 28, 2020, 15:51 Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net> wrote:
>
>> On 28 Mar 2020, at 15:15, John C Klensin wrote:
>>
>> > (I think some
>> > variation on Pete's draft is a good idea for multiple reasons,
>> > but  this is not the time and doing it in haste would be
>> > unwise.)
>>
>> I have no problem putting that document on ice for a while. It was an
>> attempt to come up with a way to avoid publishing a BCP for the
>> 2020-2021 NomCom (or any) variance. But it already sounds like people
>> would want more time to ponder the limits of it or be convinced that
>> it's actually a good idea, so it's unlikely to get published in time for
>> it to make a difference.
>>
>
> I was somewhat surprised that this draft went beyond the immediate
> question of 2020/2021 Nomcom eligibility, so if we address only that
> question as a one-time exception, and then return to the general question,
> I'd be ok with that.
>
>
I think having the variance short lived makes sense and allows us to both
deal with the immediate situation and give us some time to close any
process or documentation gaps.

regards,

Victor K


>>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email