RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-enhanced-dsmap-09

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Tue, 24 May 2011 10:16 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6C38E0657; Tue, 24 May 2011 03:16:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.612
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.612 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.013, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EGxDlAPo209S; Tue, 24 May 2011 03:16:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (asmtp2.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.249]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0046AE0680; Tue, 24 May 2011 03:16:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p4OAG1Pa018134; Tue, 24 May 2011 11:16:01 +0100
Received: from 950129200 (dsl-sp-81-140-15-32.in-addr.broadbandscope.com [81.140.15.32]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p4OAFjXJ017972 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 24 May 2011 11:15:45 +0100
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'Roni Even' <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>, draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-enhanced-dsmap.all@tools.ietf.org
References: <4ddb68a4.1dead80a.231d.ffff92e5@mx.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <4ddb68a4.1dead80a.231d.ffff92e5@mx.google.com>
Subject: RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-enhanced-dsmap-09
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 11:15:44 +0100
Message-ID: <018f01cc19fb$945fe520$bd1faf60$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Content-language: en-gb
Thread-index: AQH43P3Swcm9+f/4BI+gqlRaQZUu2JRCPLbw
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, 'IETF-Discussion list' <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 10:16:11 -0000

Thanks Roni,

> Nits/editorial comments:
>
> 1. Need to expand LDP when first mentioned.

LDP is a recognised acronym at
http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc-style-guide/abbrev.expansion.txt and does not need
to be expanded.

Cheers,
Adrian