Re: Call for Review of draft-iab-rfc4441rev-04.txt, "The IEEE 802 / IETF Relationship"

Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 06 June 2013 18:30 UTC

Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7718421F88FB for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 11:30:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.216
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.216 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.383, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hvPq-uJcnnP7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 11:30:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-x235.google.com (mail-ob0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::235]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92FA821F89EB for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 11:30:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ob0-f181.google.com with SMTP id 16so5211974obc.26 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 06 Jun 2013 11:30:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ely+jy9sH7Lmx2eNBNRop1B+z6EuIANPmTj7IqtXoEg=; b=piIWqtF/sIkeeOPSq0QfTj03yHot58LlhJUdpYuY4qrqs7JCevQSGDF+8e9A47mLbQ pW0QK/ICLMVPPvuaPQx5xk8UGqpTQYBDULVPBgQZuLWAQ7XRhlJSPa53IAHAoo21HuKJ mk4d4f0LJG/ZNgpYxJGduy9AMBfv0rxH6mIXUF5pdslHNNLvAPO6j6bo83nOaujkAvXt VbuxHXs2v8amRsDkZpw5Js3v57uuOkOYbzPh52oziivYCanWZWhJ7nU39L3m6NNlV4l/ NBmn1bjbIGVtCo4wcbjN6EX8/CTHZZ6AE9MRQMsRlKhspvkCRlQ16jrmO91IF4Xr3XwW C3mQ==
X-Received: by 10.182.80.5 with SMTP id n5mr18865546obx.88.1370543409053; Thu, 06 Jun 2013 11:30:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.77] (99-108-174-213.lightspeed.rcsntx.sbcglobal.net. [99.108.174.213]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id wz1sm45843676obc.3.2013.06.06.11.30.06 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 06 Jun 2013 11:30:07 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <51B0D4FB.4090702@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 13:29:15 -0500
From: Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Subject: Re: Call for Review of draft-iab-rfc4441rev-04.txt, "The IEEE 802 / IETF Relationship"
References: <1C23C450-8A85-4003-BD53-B78CCE418F55@iab.org> <51B08AD0.2070908@cs.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <51B08AD0.2070908@cs.tcd.ie>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: IAB Chair <iab-chair@iab.org>, IAB <iab@iab.org>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 18:30:10 -0000

On 6/6/2013 8:12 AM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> -  3.3.1.4 says: Since it is
>     possible to participate in IETF without attending meetings, or even
>     joining a mailing list, IETF WG chairs will provide the information
>     to anyone who requests it.  However, since IEEE 802 work-in-progress
>     is copyrighted, incorporating material into IETF documents or posting
>     the username/password on mailing lists or websites is not permitted.
>
> That's a pretty bogus setup. I would think that if IEEE do want to
> share some or all drafts with us they could much more easily create
> a web page when those drafts are available without access control.
> Or we could if they didn't mind. (Or I could do it if there's no "we"
> that wants to:-) Asking IETF WG chairs to deal with passwords is a
> bit silly. I'm not objecting to this, but am suggesting someone ask
> IEEE if they'd like to consider the silliness here and fix it.

Hi, Stephen,

It's probably worth pointing out to the community that both IETF and 
IEEE 802 leadership have been looking at previous revisions and asking 
"if they do that, should we do the same?"

The most recent case I can think of was that IETF published a list of 
its liaison managers, while IEEE 802 did not - but review discussions 
prompted iEEE 802 to start publishing a list of its liaison managers as 
well. There have been others.

I'd be pleasantly surprised if either organization has run out of 
bogosity to fix, of course ;-)

Spencer