IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IAOC] suggestion for the next IETFs

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Fri, 07 November 2014 13:57 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B25F31AD003 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 05:57:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.768
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.768 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, GB_I_INVITATION=-2, GB_I_LETTER=-2, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NOw26f0BLBZh for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 05:57:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gproxy10-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy10-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.20.226]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 7BD651ACFFB for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 05:57:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 31154 invoked by uid 0); 7 Nov 2014 13:57:02 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO CMOut01) (10.0.90.82) by gproxy10.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 7 Nov 2014 13:57:02 -0000
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by CMOut01 with id Cdwt1p00B2SSUrH01dwwby; Fri, 07 Nov 2014 06:57:00 -0700
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=F5TEKMRN c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=ZSdzdHkL1-cA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=wU2YTnxGAAAA:8 a=cNaOj0WVAAAA:8 a=-NfooI8aBGcA:10 a=uEJ9t1CZtbIA:10 a=ZLNf4PCHgmS4SJFcbwgA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=TXqzQAUWn+uIHWB/w7AWwQ0RDF5E1clFwwE8TQaWmvk=; b=EA8/aih+WqkGsP+ZlHLkrFONcdWFRAZy0v70XB6L7vWsT5jf57EMOg30AOPUOnOQtZUVJLFYX9Z+ZH3waHCVm7Tljx1oUlS0Xr0LmDecweKg30JDeOfKoNCNIknq0SuC;
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:52877 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1Xmk22-00052U-9F; Fri, 07 Nov 2014 06:56:54 -0700
Message-ID: <545CCFA3.6000407@labn.net>
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 08:56:51 -0500
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ray Pelletier <rpelletier@isoc.org>
Subject: Re: [IAOC] suggestion for the next IETFs
References: <003c01cff148$ecd7d1e0$c68775a0$@rozanak.com> <23623.1414349411@sandelman.ca> <CAP8yD=tO-9D7Va1Nr30U79KCUHXTjiEf2gdWXRZont45nNO+Dw@mail.gmail.com> <CB21D641-7F55-4994-811A-8ADCD993FBEE@isoc.org>
In-Reply-To: <CB21D641-7F55-4994-811A-8ADCD993FBEE@isoc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net}
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/th1jkpLBBf1EB7L6iLUvbfQ4RUQ
Cc: IAOC <iaoc@ietf.org>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 13:57:04 -0000

On 10/30/2014 09:24 AM, Ray Pelletier wrote:
> We have had a page online where individuals could request a Letter of
> Invitation
> for meetings well in advance of the meeting.  For some reason the link
> to it 
> vanished from a Meetings page, but AMS is working to get it restored.
> 

Ray,
	What's the URL for this page?

It would be really nice if we could avoid repeating the attendee visa
issues of this meeting in Dallas.  (I know of a number of ID authors/WG
participants who are unable to attend due to their visa's not coming
through in time.)

Much thanks,

Lou

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email