IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Gen-art LC (and telechat) review: draft-ietf-calext-rscale-04

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Thu, 05 March 2015 12:45 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9423D1A8773; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 04:45:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fY8bHYjXEQa8; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 04:45:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC3581A871A; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 04:45:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EB992CECD; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 14:45:42 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UxPnEC9XIQpm; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 14:45:42 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AA7E2CEC1; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 14:45:42 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_2C93FF49-B3B5-4FA1-ACCD-DD2576CE2B83"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Subject: Re: Gen-art LC (and telechat) review: draft-ietf-calext-rscale-04
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <54F5F541.3090107@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 14:45:42 +0200
Message-Id: <52391E41-7C6B-4D58-9D32-28C7AED98036@piuha.net>
References: <54F5E92F.7030002@nostrum.com> <619D561548E6D87707B49948@caldav.corp.apple.com> <54F5F541.3090107@nostrum.com>
To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/u21b2VbqdxPwrJj6PGn0MRJlhX4>
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-calext-rscale@tools.ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, calsify@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 12:45:45 -0000

>> 
>> Now you are right that the introduction does use "updates" in the prose for 5546 and 4791. Perhaps it would be better to use "clarifies use of" for 5546 and "extends" for 4791. So I am proposing the following change:
>> 
>>     It updates iCalendar [RFC5545], xCal [RFC6321], and jCal
>>     [RFC7265], to extend the "RRULE" property definition.
>> 
>>     It clarifies use of iTIP [RFC5546] to specify how the extended "RRULE"
>>     property should be handled in iTIP messages.
>> 
>>     It extends CalDAV [RFC4791] to specify how the extended "RRULE"
>>     property can be supported by CalDAV servers and clients.
>> 
>> Would that be better?
> I think so.

This works for me as well.

I am assuming the sponsoring AD will ensure that the changes get implemented in the draft before the RFC Editor takes it over. I have balloted No-Obj for this draft in tonight’s IESG telechat.

Jari

P.S. Many thanks for your review, Robert!

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email