IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IETF Endowment update

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Wed, 13 July 2016 19:50 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF6AF12D5C6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 12:50:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.287
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.287 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qh25NwfiZBpk for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 12:50:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [193.110.157.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10A2212D54F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 12:50:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3rqTvs0ybbzL4f; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 21:50:33 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1468439433; bh=/GNuAUvE12ihevTaeLQlMHahIzcYdycVHGVwQQ/lu1o=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=Kl8rJxnAm4TzftsGEIrcOh1dKZeqA9b8WQk/LptC66oPNyxZTAkmWukTuat+2VIEZ QiFcYCGwMPaBC8LNkDAL5zF3NNX6TrqxBdvcqfSdaan2PJW7R2uVrjbgESukgN4sw1 RoV4wHDzo7AxgyUDGQvDr6v/SSfKL+sbp1IiZ5RA=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gdipARnOD4Xn; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 21:50:32 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (206-248-139-105.dsl.teksavvy.com [206.248.139.105]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 21:50:32 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 72814393D6E; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 15:50:31 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 bofh.nohats.ca 72814393D6E
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A084415FC92; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 15:50:31 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 15:50:31 -0400
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>
Subject: Re: IETF Endowment update
In-Reply-To: <54034490-F431-489E-BEAC-547704CF6F7E@shockey.us>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.20.1607131548480.15299@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <D3AA6473.17603E%brown@isoc.org> <4CFE92A053EFFCAC5A1EBF2C@JcK-HP8200> <alpine.LRH.2.20.1607121312390.18547@bofh.nohats.ca> <54034490-F431-489E-BEAC-547704CF6F7E@shockey.us>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (LRH 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/uU9ylI9KOCx14A-vtTDJaAoCWlU>
Cc: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, Kathy Brown <brown@isoc.org>, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 19:50:38 -0000

On Tue, 12 Jul 2016, Richard Shockey wrote:

> John, Paul let me ask the obvious question.  What were you expecting the Open Internet Endowment to do beyond the IETF?
>
> Outreach to National Regulatory Authorities, for instance? Support for independent research beyond IRTF? Better funding for young technologists?
>
> It’s a serious question.  ISOC’s mission statement isself relatively amorphous.

Honestly, I don't remember. There was some presentation I listed to at
one of the IETF's and it appealed to me and I wanted to donate. I thought
it would do something new and different. I did not expect to be paying
"some extra IETF fees".

Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email