Re: Last Call: RFC Editor Services Draft RFI

Ray Pelletier <rpelletier@isoc.org> Thu, 08 January 2009 18:10 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D23543A67A4; Thu, 8 Jan 2009 10:10:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A6D83A68DB for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Jan 2009 10:10:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.887
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.887 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.288, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p25+ffqT6ErI for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Jan 2009 10:10:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp227.iad.emailsrvr.com (smtp227.iad.emailsrvr.com [207.97.245.227]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5DBA3A63D3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Jan 2009 10:10:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay12.relay.iad.mlsrvr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay12.relay.iad.mlsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 3BDE420D5B9; Thu, 8 Jan 2009 13:09:55 -0500 (EST)
Received: by relay12.relay.iad.mlsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: rpelletier-AT-isoc.org) with ESMTPSA id 1F37120A979; Thu, 8 Jan 2009 13:09:55 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <703D6C1A-EB55-4866-9C0A-CD4AED1D5DC8@isoc.org>
From: Ray Pelletier <rpelletier@isoc.org>
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
In-Reply-To: <0400901BDD034F2FABE887D3@PST.jck.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3)
Subject: Re: Last Call: RFC Editor Services Draft RFI
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2009 13:09:54 -0500
References: <20090105165556.EC8653A67DA@core3.amsl.com> <0400901BDD034F2FABE887D3@PST.jck.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3)
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

On Jan 7, 2009, at 11:57 PM, John C Klensin wrote:

> This document is hard to comment on because it raises, and
> mixes, a number of separate issues.  A large number of those
> involve questions that the RFI responses might reasonably
> address; I have omitted those from these comments unless they
> are directly related to more immediate issues.
>
> The document is repetitive internally and duplicates material
> from other materials.  In particularly, Appendix B duplicates
> much of the material on pages 3 - 5.  I have not made these
> comments longer by pointing out each place a particular problem
> occurs.
>
> Major issues:

> <snip>

>
> (13) The Production Center is committed to follow the
> provisions of a Style Manual that does not exist today, is
> unlikely to exist when the RFP goes out, and may become the
> first task for the newly-appointed RFC Series Editor in January
> 2010.   I hope the IAB has a plan about how that particular bit
> of transition is going to be handled and that the plan has been
> vetted by the IAOC.  If not, this is another internal normative
> dependency.

John,

The Style Manual is located here:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc-style-guide/rfc-style-manual-08.txt

Ray

<snip>
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf