IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: [secdir] Secdir review comments for draft-ietf-pim-bidir-08

"Joseph Salowey \(jsalowey\)" <jsalowey@cisco.com> Thu, 08 February 2007 05:34 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HF1v3-0004oA-9J; Thu, 08 Feb 2007 00:34:05 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HF1v1-0004nm-CZ; Thu, 08 Feb 2007 00:34:03 -0500
Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com ([171.71.176.117]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HF1uz-0001pG-1t; Thu, 08 Feb 2007 00:34:03 -0500
Received: from sj-dkim-3.cisco.com ([171.71.179.195]) by sj-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 07 Feb 2007 21:34:00 -0800
X-IronPort-AV: i="4.13,299,1167638400"; d="scan'208"; a="110261694:sNHT44725302"
Received: from sj-core-5.cisco.com (sj-core-5.cisco.com [171.71.177.238]) by sj-dkim-3.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l185Y0Ym014177; Wed, 7 Feb 2007 21:34:00 -0800
Received: from xbh-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-211.cisco.com [171.70.151.144]) by sj-core-5.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id l185Y0Uw012597; Wed, 7 Feb 2007 21:34:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from xmb-sjc-225.amer.cisco.com ([128.107.191.38]) by xbh-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 7 Feb 2007 21:33:59 -0800
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 21:33:58 -0800
Message-ID: <AC1CFD94F59A264488DC2BEC3E890DE50335D7F9@xmb-sjc-225.amer.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <20070208052045.14F077660C6@berkshire.machshav.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [secdir] Secdir review comments for draft-ietf-pim-bidir-08
Thread-Index: AcdLQOWIXHQ+Pj8eTq2sk6XHHIMsoQAAPvxA
From: "Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)" <jsalowey@cisco.com>
To: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@cs.columbia.edu>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Feb 2007 05:33:59.0546 (UTC) FILETIME=[BBE28DA0:01C74B42]
DKIM-Signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=873; t=1170912840; x=1171776840; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim3002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=jsalowey@cisco.com; z=From:=20=22Joseph=20Salowey=20\(jsalowey\)=22=20<jsalowey@cisco.com> |Subject:=20RE=3A=20[secdir]=20Secdir=20review=20comments=20for=20draft-i etf-pim-bidir-08 |Sender:=20; bh=9O2u5izrFzfTxAFqcMlCwNmOGcLoF+Vusin5oXoqjdg=; b=mzK1gMz0CWvb+iPGCTFoMZjU8+uzAqLFIP0GfvfU2tHPBuUzFDljsZM30mV+cCRXJPBL+gKq Lt1eRQtj1LYXqRdOd4bMUTY3OXyLgxxRFLHw2TclXtbFsl9tAJOH4HWe;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-3; header.From=jsalowey@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim3002 verified; );
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 2409bba43e9c8d580670fda8b695204a
Cc: lorenzo@cisco.com, ietf@ietf.org, "Isidor Kouvelas (kouvelas)" <kouvelas@cisco.com>, secdir@mit.edu, "Tony Speakman (speakman)" <speakman@cisco.com>, pim-chairs@tools.ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, M.Handley@cs.ucl.ac.uk
Subject: RE: [secdir] Secdir review comments for draft-ietf-pim-bidir-08
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steven M. Bellovin [mailto:smb@cs.columbia.edu] 
> Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 9:21 PM
> To: Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)
> Cc: iesg@ietf.org; secdir@mit.edu; M.Handley@cs.ucl.ac.uk; 
> Isidor Kouvelas (kouvelas); Tony Speakman (speakman); 
> lorenzo@cisco.com; pim-chairs@tools.ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [secdir] Secdir review comments for 
> draft-ietf-pim-bidir-08
> 
> On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 21:14:35 -0800
> "Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)" <jsalowey@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> > I would like to understand better why ...
> > no automated key management
> > is specified.   
> > 
> Do they cite any of the reasons listed in RFC 4107?
> 
[Joe] No, but some of them may apply.  Thanks for the reference
reminder.


> 
> 
> 		--Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
> 

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email