Re: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees inviteyour reviewand comments on a proposed Work-Around to the Pre-5378Problem

John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Sun, 11 January 2009 00:32 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73DDC3A6921; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 16:32:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 035073A6921 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 16:32:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.613
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.613 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.014, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bUs5ULOc9Fe6 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 16:32:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bs.jck.com (ns.jck.com [209.187.148.211]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E8C83A6834 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 16:32:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=localhost) by bs.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1LLoFN-0003Tk-T1; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 19:32:10 -0500
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 19:32:01 -0500
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: lrosen@rosenlaw.com, 'IETF Discussion' <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees inviteyour reviewand comments on a proposed Work-Around to the Pre-5378Problem
Message-ID: <90D9DDCC3289478C37EBC02E@PST.jck.com>
In-Reply-To: <2113074208-1231627769-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1487519320-@bxe178.bisx.prod.on.blackberry>
References: <2113074208-1231627769-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1487519320-@bxe178.bisx.prod.on.blackberry>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org


--On Saturday, January 10, 2009 22:48 +0000 lrosen@rosenlaw.com
wrote:

> FWIW, I am serving pro bono in the public interest, and I hope
> everyone else here would also. /Larry

And you have no clients, even clients for whom you are working
pro bono, who have a vested position in the outcome of these
discussions?

That is certainly not consistent with things you have said in
the past.  My sympathies on your loss of business relationships.

   john




_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf