Re: draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Sun, 01 September 2013 16:08 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4811A11E8208 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Sep 2013 09:08:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.996
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.996 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.018, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y6iGEvip85EM for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Sep 2013 09:08:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vb0-x22f.google.com (mail-vb0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c02::22f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A71C011E81FF for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Sep 2013 09:08:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vb0-f47.google.com with SMTP id h10so2451206vbh.34 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 01 Sep 2013 09:08:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=Au176YkFZ5h1jwDZwFOvnAGWwqebX1m+z7QRKIGfX2k=; b=i6zheXSMqss0xP5jnDNHXTc+otCH+v/igVh/qy6wrmWFOffs2l+fApsVNL4Urel2fi cr6TIw/U99K/UA44qGemqh0C4MxYxY8pENUem22vq5vr5pm/UBhJfof+LBa+0s/naNIA 3K5oeUQB2tIQOTijSVd4uS9FMdyJnXJoSH/DnGLPty5yRxhiKg4JAIJRkPkJ9SsRcnGh a5dqY3XPhU/7AyjjLhhTyU1JVTfHhe2PoO8LucnNWRVJJmVVIE61Oa7fmgdYGgHoBdO5 5Wjint0RdyIgqhYd+MzobV7GKYOxpY8QJcfOUXy9FGPwZn/Pcrd13Rx+5LUkZyXVfmFd rC7Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.221.64.17 with SMTP id xg17mr18717400vcb.5.1378051731009; Sun, 01 Sep 2013 09:08:51 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com
Received: by 10.58.215.16 with HTTP; Sun, 1 Sep 2013 09:08:50 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <9ddbed1c-78d7-47a7-ac63-490e389ba0d4@email.android.com>
References: <52222FD1.9000805@gmail.com> <5222C585.3010106@gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20130831222258.0b590b60@elandnews.com> <1787410.DcsOcSFY3Y@scott-latitude-e6320> <5222E166.7040902@gmail.com> <9ddbed1c-78d7-47a7-ac63-490e389ba0d4@email.android.com>
Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2013 12:08:50 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: ulUG7ScHoRTlvN1w2Hloc-svOmg
Message-ID: <CAC4RtVCvb_tQykyKvg52UuZ9kwq9UnQq+fdFwA6PZjo9Jv8LXQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2013 16:08:55 -0000

On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 5:50 AM, Scott Kitterman <scott@kitterman.com> wrote:
>
>>I think it's particularly incumbent on native English speakers to
>>avoid highly idiomatic or stylized language - English that is not
>>taught to non-native speakers.  It may be better to say something
>>along those lines, although I don't think you can go too wrong
>>in remind people to communicate clearly.  (This is not entirely
>>unrelated to the seeking consensus issue)
>
> That's true,  but the emphasis is in the wrong place.
>
> I think the behavior standard is "try to communicate clearly".  What you
> describe for native speakers is an example of things that help do that.

I think Scott has put this perfectly, and it's exactly right.  The
main point is clear communication.  Everything else is advice about
how to achieve that.

On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Abdussalam Baryun
<abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I always think the problem of not understanding a message in IETF is
> not the fault of the transmitter, but it is the receiver's fault. The
> receiver SHOULD make more efforts to understand, or send a reply to
> request clarifications (specially in IETF WGs when discussing
> technical issues). The fault cannot be the used-language or the way
> the language is used, but the fault can be low performance of
> communication or low purpose of such work at receiver end.

I agree that the "receivers" should (and generally do, in my
observation, but see below) try hard to understand the "transmitter".
That said, I can assure you that if I should try to communicate with
you in your native language, all fault in the total communication
failure that would ensue would be mine.

We're all individuals, and we have different tolerance levels -- some
of us are more patient than others in trying to understand.  That
said, this is also a collaborative environment, where everyone needs
to do her part.  Native speakers need to use a level of English that's
likely to be accessible to non-natives, and to do the best they can to
understand what others are saying.  Non-native speakers need to do
what they can to improve their English skills.  Everyone has
responsibility.

Barry