Re: draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Wed, 04 September 2013 08:15 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72F0221E80AB for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Sep 2013 01:15:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.566
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.566 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.033, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Du9dP96rJb4L for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Sep 2013 01:15:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E345221E80B1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Sep 2013 01:15:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([197.224.136.208]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r848ExXw007360 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 4 Sep 2013 01:15:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1378282512; bh=rhrHvvPCDy3B4IoBXRIZLblLWhEEte4jKEsx7fmN1QA=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=VvsqMveCr7pzhtNAFDEx7Gj6cFNES1arlXR7elw37fQ8RabMeVrbfmb2oqWTJMdeL wvZnGS2c18ADwvy8yN3kHrB3oFtA+2XkE9a/1GR6RQMMWagMmADKFqZIoZl4f5shqc dc/BDFoAinjhZ6DgHFY51+aHCUdjwi2g/RcxmqZo=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1378282512; i=@elandsys.com; bh=rhrHvvPCDy3B4IoBXRIZLblLWhEEte4jKEsx7fmN1QA=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=rAkz8A5ZfsWPFNOCbObUYP8Gop+YSe4DwEPCUWhTQNrm1TnPSAORgs7S7juSN7jsS WdH5NiuRKcUvJIn0b9IVxUWpLIQYr7W0GqUR0N2e8dcXzm8cd3XMMfNkKT0XNr0Sbs nsST2LiIQRn8aR6W9l8K9GcAtzafIQ7yzU/YJ1ek=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20130903235958.074c05f0@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2013 00:16:37 -0700
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Subject: Re: draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis
In-Reply-To: <CAC4RtVBv7LFKsVO__EuWm_i46O+gB6xihd9U3Dnhg7hjGMFG2g@mail.g mail.com>
References: <52222FD1.9000805@gmail.com> <5222C585.3010106@gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20130831222258.0b590b60@elandnews.com> <1787410.DcsOcSFY3Y@scott-latitude-e6320> <6.2.5.6.2.20130902235510.0a8a4340@resistor.net> <CAC4RtVBv7LFKsVO__EuWm_i46O+gB6xihd9U3Dnhg7hjGMFG2g@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: Scott Kitterman <scott@kitterman.com>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2013 08:15:38 -0000

At 13:16 03-09-2013, Barry Leiba wrote:
>I agree with Scott that the stuff between the commas doesn't belong here.
>
>That is, it doesn't belong *here*; it can certainly go into a sentence
>or paragraph with advice for native English speakers.  Consider
>something like this instead:
>
>    Participants must do their best to accommodate the needs of other
>    participants by communicating clearly.  When faced with English that
>    is difficult to understand, we must all make the effort to understand it
>    nonetheless, engaging in conversation to clarify what was meant.
>    Native English speakers, in particular, should be careful with the use
>    of slang and cultural references that might not be well known to everyone.

I'll try and come up with text to reflect the above and the other 
feedback about that part of the draft.

>That might not be exactly right; please try to understand me, and
>tweak as necessary.

:-)

At 13:36 03-09-2013, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>I do think that's better. In my experience, once code of conduct 
>type language is codified, eventually someone will try to use it as 
>a hammer. It needs to be crafted with this assumption in mind.

My reading of the feedback is that the above is a concern.

At 19:58 03-09-2013, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>I agree that trying to figure things out is a net positive.  What I want to
>avoid is someone making excuses claiming that since they aren't a native
>speaker it's somebody else's problem to understand them.

Ok.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy