Re: Last Call: Selection and Operation of Secondary DNS Servers to BCP
Ivan Pintori <pint001@it.net> Fri, 13 September 1996 17:46 UTC
Received: from ietf.org by ietf.org id aa04058; 13 Sep 96 13:46 EDT
Received: from dns.IT.net by ietf.org id aa03920; 13 Sep 96 13:38 EDT
Received: from pint001.pn.itnet.it (~me@pint001.pn.ITnet.it [151.2.28.5]) by dns.it.net (8.6.9/8.6.9) with SMTP id TAA04429; Fri, 13 Sep 1996 19:36:40 +0200
Message-Id: <1.5.4.32.19960913180653.006a8cfc@151.1.1.1>
X-Sender: pint001@151.1.1.1
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.4 (32)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 1996 20:06:53 +0200
To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>, ietf@ietf.org
Sender: ietf-request@ietf.org
From: Ivan Pintori <pint001@it.net>
Subject: Re: Last Call: Selection and Operation of Secondary DNS Servers to BCP
Cc: randy@psg.com, sob@harvard.eduEMail
Source-Info: From (or Sender) name not authenticated.
At 13.06 12/09/96 -0700, Dave Crocker wrote: >In reply to your message stating: >> The IESG has received a request from the DNS IXFR, Notification, and >> Dynamic Update Working Group to consider "Selection and Operation of >> Secondary DNS Servers" <draft-ietf-dnsind-2ndry-03.txt> for the status >> of BCP. >> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits > >Small comment: <!snip!> I am much in favor to Dave's comment. DNS and Secondary DNS service is VERY important indeed. 80% of the problems come just from that: badly configured and choosed secondary DNSes (not to mention the fact that many miss configure the primary too... <Anti Micro$lot bash on> and is not a low performace and low reliability WindozeNT machine that does the trick in the end. <Anti Micro$lot bash off> (sorry for bashing :)))) >d/ ivan > >-------------------- >Dave Crocker +1 408 246 8253