Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-pce-inter-layer-ext-12.txt> (Extensions to the Path Computation Element communication Protocol (PCEP) for Inter-Layer MPLS and GMPLS Traffic Engineering) to Proposed Standard

Billy Bishop <bishopbilly84@gmail.com> Wed, 15 February 2017 20:08 UTC

Return-Path: <bishopbilly84@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D79C71297BE for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 12:08:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.448
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6u5akElgqUdt for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 12:08:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vk0-x234.google.com (mail-vk0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3ED32129A2F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 12:08:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vk0-x234.google.com with SMTP id k127so106013934vke.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 12:08:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=GT/LU6Am1qslGHJGIBjQs5KOEIUy529ypvw00xuMinM=; b=XlvkMjdVbVHB6iI9zYpVn6sTekgm6tif/bO1ClMSrCwMkhxXsJOmKlAa9f2P0rJnUu lWwZlgzd5YwXuZKvkqmJTwnNQQaXsn4ABy07qTZWnwSTd+H4DgBA1n+e/xoohxeumbBE Ma4m+2V77RwnIMY0LVokniH0GRaP3KHcQFA0Tl1UAWROytaPwnVYRaJxnLQoBnAjOhjY DICoHBrf+2fC07Y/P15iF4h4ROhc5qdeoXBd5g3D8LrRSqJBJirHlM9DxAQvrK2VOkBM j0wbT6d1cXoZTK2ybVbFwikVsmW+5XhkYk4SM8M+kUIQYFkdqrTD/XHa0+4fVh3XguPa Kkhg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=GT/LU6Am1qslGHJGIBjQs5KOEIUy529ypvw00xuMinM=; b=hXka1rLWG0FZTwNIoP6V2iTYX3xuOWfhBMDPVf77I29iOb2MOhl8z8UsLGPF4rFBEY +oyv51cf3mFT+R+Q0q0soWQEBTqr+VlyfyKco7wYnqqfvZObNSZiHuXCTF+pYvwa+ee6 xBD4z32dmLfxZM19K0+4kdHvXe3RP4p4HNr/+v9TfHFTrwluvBjmEFj8EN+LRG7Vx/3x MVsE+h8E0xeqpA0VWQdqX1UuoGx9WGI3q0d+jiuqD90tOQX2PQhHjE/PR8adUQODLQfX hHmoaBMzWvUWNHaUthGEZANTHy0PkIHEch/54M3YujK3fR6cYARPY7clqM+wLPA+nxYA cGTg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39nOfVfP0irWdf83hrYhbc9yx2hYpV34Nkn1QPiSTu+QJF1UqvkTjUzcp+a9+Ru9hwaJp5XRxJC8H47N/Q==
X-Received: by 10.31.146.209 with SMTP id u200mr18560390vkd.163.1487189288214; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 12:08:08 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.176.8.153 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 12:08:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.176.8.153 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 12:08:07 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <148718908812.31454.5452489853774556097.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <148718908812.31454.5452489853774556097.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Billy Bishop <bishopbilly84@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 12:08:07 -0800
Message-ID: <CAApmNcQUqkd=jgYTh3Sbr7PojCqqeLneED_ZXx=rOFp6OB4opg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-pce-inter-layer-ext-12.txt> (Extensions to the Path Computation Element communication Protocol (PCEP) for Inter-Layer MPLS and GMPLS Traffic Engineering) to Proposed Standard
To: ietf@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11438c223d00850548973d6b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/w4L3Ni-NQypLSFa2fHisnVz01qE>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 20:08:11 -0000

On Feb 15, 2017 2:05 PM, "The IESG" <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> wrote:

>
> The IESG has received a request from the Path Computation Element WG
> (pce) to consider the following document:
> - 'Extensions to the Path Computation Element communication Protocol
>    (PCEP) for Inter-Layer MPLS and GMPLS Traffic Engineering'
>   <draft-ietf-pce-inter-layer-ext-12.txt> as Proposed Standard
>
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
> ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2017-03-01. Exceptionally, comments may be
> sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
>
> Abstract
>
>
>    The Path Computation Element (PCE) provides path computation
>    functions in support of traffic engineering in Multiprotocol Label
>    Switching (MPLS) and Generalized MPLS (GMPLS) networks.
>
>    MPLS and GMPLS networks may be constructed from layered service
>    networks.  It is advantageous for overall network efficiency to
>    provide end-to-end traffic engineering across multiple network layers
>    through a process called inter-layer traffic engineering.  PCE is a
>    candidate solution for such requirements.
>
>    The PCE communication Protocol (PCEP) is designed as a communication
>    protocol between Path Computation Clients (PCCs) and PCEs.  This
>    document presents PCEP extensions for inter-layer traffic
>    engineering.
>
>
>
>
>
> The file can be obtained via
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-inter-layer-ext/
>
> IESG discussion can be tracked via
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-inter-layer-ext/ballot/
>
>
> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
>
>
> The document contains these normative downward references.
> See RFC 3967 for additional information:
>     draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp: PCEP Extensions for PCE-initiated
> LSP Setup in a Stateful PCE Model (None - IETF stream)
> Note that some of these references may already be listed in the acceptable
> Downref Registry.
>
>
>