More mail madness?

Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> Mon, 14 May 2018 15:53 UTC

Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83992126BF7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 May 2018 08:53:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GBl2_W10JpwU for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 May 2018 08:52:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x233.google.com (mail-oi0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2BA912D950 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 May 2018 08:52:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x233.google.com with SMTP id n65-v6so11127068oig.6 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 May 2018 08:52:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=1sjtb7CCFOcJmJfaCVK2EcyMAkKNTRmwkQv/TgTH794=; b=IfsCsBxWqgNVTaBQNK+MTgUuz18KwJqGYNfIL7d/T2WRM7h96DjO5ivM9k8qeqIsXL ye3WZFAKSC2vixvHueemooauXupoE8zYYPyIVaRziqMdM+9pE3DfXvygo85DPju8sWdp zYw6mt6Z9HHFxo0EGrP4lH7rVRqZo5WVDCSBo1o5AN2jP4+C2Re5g/RPCRYXNKI6KBmv ROzm/kkPm5kG4gZuMHyYFkeWe3pSO8WAa4CHq9VSysC+sPh1oAo2KvdEHPcMa0nv+dvt hVvNoe/rjifSTTFCSFq3lnyJa2qLVbP43DLL4o9uZiITvYQdY/y5Elh63aEIWnLtXpC3 pI2g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject :to; bh=1sjtb7CCFOcJmJfaCVK2EcyMAkKNTRmwkQv/TgTH794=; b=Eq1IHEkx1EDtwVDHUBCmJe4rnYUh3noRx3CK+1ueTAkYGL7laa017O8uN7tqeknQ74 LwpvrV7ir2rAPIMuvdM0g/IY5ZyF0r6KLAGTvFD9Y6122fGUAg6zuB4FsheUWmfnUqE/ NkEdH1qAlomgwN3fnTw0n9OHiJywBTlQdonFHkzLlmshP1flAIw+/xC9KYZk/XkXQm3v G6v2PrDSllL+Y1dFx1ZiTpKCr9TqWZ3ZtbNpnKowe4B9DyfG1WTFT294pXQ0xTDjFyg5 yxqwydqPRXIHkZv6kpDccbBdHGw+iNuD8Ljj3KU8l7TY1gU4cr8C4AYAyv0wY1YQz/uA g4sQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwcvId0G03D15mQ6C5BxXXSC8gCKOd/McXD7oAILPDRNBS3snJyb VP5u3Jx13SrxYrpSUWYKCflY8sUeutD0eXHKeCw3rg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZqLTZcp5amDIy7HOzq8oW0+UOk+Hapm8gLCt41tJeEQSoz/CN5yuwifmNU/hShDQIOesOfofXUFQ6sPzeB7+bw=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:3387:: with SMTP id z129-v6mr7331956oiz.49.1526313178819; Mon, 14 May 2018 08:52:58 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: hallam@gmail.com
Received: by 2002:a9d:23:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Mon, 14 May 2018 08:52:58 -0700 (PDT)
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 11:52:58 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: HrhRhUuoDftpCANr9eo22ay7jyY
Message-ID: <CAMm+LwiOfdptL6u=SyCtQnz7xKrJD6HTDkKs+JGeHf54CSiv8A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: More mail madness?
To: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d6f29f056c2c7a4a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/x54PmOjYdf3GwCndlgmO0m6XQ_g>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 15:53:01 -0000

This is a security issue certainly, but it is a particular type of issue
that arises from attempting to analyze the security of a large and complex
system built from parts whose interactions as so complicated that they are
never likely to be sufficiently understood.

https://efail.de/

Basically the attack is to create a new multipart MIME message and sandwich
the ciphertexts we wish to break between chunks of HTML with a URL
reference to a web server we control.

This sort of attack could be devastating in certain situations.


The other attack they describe, the CBC gadget attack is one that I have
already been using a control against. I use a key derivation function to
calculate IVs rather than passing them in-band. I started doing this
because it cleans up the message flows a lot but it also turns out to have
security advantages.