Re: [Speechsc] Last Call: <draft-ietf-speechsc-mrcpv2-24.txt> (Media Resource Control Protocol Version 2 (MRCPv2)) to Proposed Standard
Dan Burnett <dburnett@voxeo.com> Mon, 21 March 2011 16:14 UTC
Return-Path: <dburnett@voxeo.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4FC53A688F; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 09:14:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IkCeFrXwrw5w; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 09:14:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from voxeo.com (mmail.voxeo.com [66.193.54.208]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ADDD3A688C; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 09:14:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [76.111.43.10] (account dburnett@voxeo.com HELO [192.168.15.102]) by voxeo.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.8) with ESMTPSA id 82865853; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 16:15:56 +0000
Message-Id: <44AFF408-12B0-439F-A483-70169ACC4636@voxeo.com>
From: Dan Burnett <dburnett@voxeo.com>
To: Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D822845.808@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Subject: Re: [Speechsc] Last Call: <draft-ietf-speechsc-mrcpv2-24.txt> (Media Resource Control Protocol Version 2 (MRCPv2)) to Proposed Standard
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 12:15:55 -0400
References: <20110316191330.15705.6182.idtracker@localhost> <4D822845.808@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936)
Cc: speechsc@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 16:14:26 -0000
Thank you. Based on your comments I have made the following changes to section 13.6 in my working copy (which will be reflected in the next draft): - Made reference to RFC 4395 Informative rather than Normative. - Replaced "URL" with "URI" - Added "Status" of "Permanent" - Replaced the "Encoding considerations" text with "There are no other encoding considerations for the 'session' URIs not described in RFC 3986 [RFC3986]." and added RFC 3986 as a normative reference. - Removed "The character set for URLs is restricted to US-ASCII." from the Interoperability considerations field. - Changed "Intended usage" to "URI scheme semantics" - In the "Security considerations" field, added "Generic security considerations for URIs described in RFC 3986 apply to this scheme as well" and adjusted the remaining text appropriately. - Added "iesg@ietf.org" in Author/Change controller field. -- dan On Mar 17, 2011, at 11:27 AM, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote: > Hello all, > > I'd like to comment the some sections regarding section 13.6 of > draft-ietf-speechsc-mrcpv2-24, that is currently in Last Call. > > So, some comments in-line. > >> 13.6. session URL scheme registration >> >> IANA is requested to register the following new URI scheme. The >> information below follows the template given in RFC4395 [RFC4395]. > Here informative reference to RFC 4395 will be more appropriate. > Moreover, below URL should be replaced by URI, per RFC 4395. >> URL scheme name: "session" > What status is requested - Permanent or Provisional? >> URL scheme syntax: The syntax of this scheme is identical to that >> defined for the "cid" scheme in section 2 of RFC2392. >> Character encoding considerations: URI values are limited to >> the US- >> ASCII character set. > Here it would be better to say that "There are no other encoding > considerations for the 'session' URIs not described in RFC 3986 > [RFC3986]" with a normative reference to RFC 3986 or have a > normative reference to ASCII standard. >> Intended usage: The URI is intended to identify a data resource >> previously given to the network computing resource. The >> purpose >> of this scheme is to permit access to the specific resource for >> the lifetime of the session with the entity storing the >> resource. >> The media type of the resource CAN vary. There is no explicit >> mechanism for communication of the media type. This scheme is >> currently widely used internally by existing implementations, >> and >> the registration is intended to provide information in the rare >> (and unfortunate) case that the scheme is used elsewhere. The >> scheme SHOULD NOT be used for open internet protocols. > I cannot find such field in RFC 4395 template. Maybe you meant URI > semantics? >> Applications and/or protocols which use this URL scheme name: >> This >> scheme name is used by MRCPv2 clients and servers. >> Interoperability considerations: >> The character set for URLs is restricted to US-ASCII. Note >> that >> none of the resources are accessible after the MCRPv2 session >> ends, hence the name of the scheme. For clients who >> establish one >> MRCPv2 session only for the entire speech application being >> implemented this is sufficient, but clients who create, >> terminate, >> and recreate MRCP sessions for performance or scalability >> reasons >> will lose access to resources established in the earlier >> session(s). >> Security considerations: The URIs defined here provide an >> identification mechanism only. Given that the communication >> channel between client and server is secure, that the server >> correctly accesses the resource associated with the URI, and >> that >> the server ensures session-only lifetime and access for each >> URI, >> the only remaining security issues are those of the types of >> media >> referred to by the URI. > You should also have mentioned that generic security considerations > for URIs described in RFC 3986 apply to this scheme as well. >> Relevant publications: This specification, particularly sections >> Section 6.2.7, Section 8.5.2, Section 9.5.1, and Section 9.9. >> Contact for further information: Sarvi Shanmugham, >> sarvi@cisco.com >> Author/Change controller: IESG > Good to add the iesg@ietf.org address here. > > Thanks for considering my comments in advance. > > Mykyta Yevstifeyev > > 16.03.2011 21:13, The IESG wrote: >> The IESG has received a request from the Speech Services Control WG >> (speechsc) to consider the following document: >> - 'Media Resource Control Protocol Version 2 (MRCPv2)' >> <draft-ietf-speechsc-mrcpv2-24.txt> as a Proposed Standard >> >> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits >> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to >> the >> ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2011-04-13. (This allows an >> additional two >> weeks for review since the document is large and the review period >> overlaps >> the Prague IETF meeting). Exceptionally, comments may be >> sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the >> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. >> >> The file can be obtained via >> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-speechsc-mrcpv2/ >> >> IESG discussion can be tracked via >> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-speechsc-mrcpv2/ >> >> >> >> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. >> _______________________________________________ >> IETF-Announce mailing list >> IETF-Announce@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce >> > > _______________________________________________ > Speechsc mailing list > Speechsc@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/speechsc > Supplemental web site: > <http://www.standardstrack.com/ietf/speechsc>
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-speechsc-mrcpv2-24.txt… Mykyta Yevstifeyev
- Re: [Speechsc] Last Call: <draft-ietf-speechsc-mr… Dan Burnett
- Re: [Speechsc] Last Call: <draft-ietf-speechsc-mr… Slawomir Testowy
- Re: [Speechsc] Last Call: <draft-ietf-speechsc-mr… Slawomir Testowy
- Re: [Speechsc] Last Call: <draft-ietf-speechsc-mr… Dan Burnett